H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Bettina Bunge vs Catherine Tanvier H2H: 2-1
Bettina Bunge holds a 2–1 lead over Catherine Tanvier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Bettina Bunge leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bettina Bunge won the 1986 Brighton third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 63
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 61
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 1986* | Brighton | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Bettina Bunge | 6-4 6-2 | Catherine Tanvier | Match data |
| Nov 8, 1985* | Hilversum | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Catherine Tanvier | 6-4 6-3 | Bettina Bunge | Match data |
| Aug 17, 1981 | Toronto | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Bettina Bunge | 6-1 6-1 | Catherine Tanvier | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bettina Bunge | #135 | #8 | 58 | 2,123 | 294 | 182 | 61.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Catherine Tanvier | #752 | #20 | 22 | 1,877 | 161 | 179 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bettina Bunge | Catherine Tanvier | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1978 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1979 | 16–20 | 44.4% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 6–14 | 30.0% | — | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1980 | 31–23 | 57.4% | — | 1,882 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 23–19 | 54.8% | — | 1,791 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1981 | 50–23 | 68.5% | — | 2,023 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 17–16 | 51.5% | — | 1,824 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1982 | 43–21 | 67.2% | — | 2,019 | 0 | 4 | 1984 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #30 | 1,777 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1983 | 26–11 | 70.3% | — | 2,012 | 0 | 5 | 1985 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #39 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1984 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #21 | 1,908 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #37 | 1,825 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1985 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #22 | 1,846 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #96 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1986 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #12 | 2,014 | 0 | 5 | 1988 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #77 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1987 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #15 | 1,925 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #99 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1989 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #72 | 1,903 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #104 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #105 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #543 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |