H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Bettina Bunge vs Eva Pfaff H2H: 0-1
Eva Pfaff holds a 1–0 lead over Bettina Bunge in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Eva Pfaff leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Eva Pfaff won the 1984 Houston fourth round 6-2 3-1 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 63
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 65
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 1984* | Houston | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Eva Pfaff | 6-2 3-1 (ret.) | Bettina Bunge | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bettina Bunge | #135 | #8 | 58 | 2,123 | 294 | 182 | 61.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Eva Pfaff | #420 | #17 | 21 | 1,902 | 155 | 202 | 43.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bettina Bunge | Eva Pfaff | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1978 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1979 | 16–20 | 44.4% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1980 | 31–23 | 57.4% | — | 1,882 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1981 | 50–23 | 68.5% | — | 2,023 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1982 | 43–21 | 67.2% | — | 2,019 | 0 | 4 | 1980 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1983 | 26–11 | 70.3% | — | 2,012 | 0 | 5 | 1981 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1984 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #21 | 1,908 | 0 | 5 | 1982 | 18–22 | 45.0% | — | 1,777 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1985 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #22 | 1,846 | 0 | 5 | 1983 | 31–21 | 59.6% | — | 1,856 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1986 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #12 | 2,014 | 0 | 5 | 1984 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1987 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #15 | 1,925 | 0 | 5 | 1985 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #39 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #58 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1989 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #72 | 1,903 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #74 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #104 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #152 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #203 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |