H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Bettina Bunge vs Iva Budarova H2H: 5-0
Bettina Bunge holds a 5–0 lead over Iva Budarova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Bettina Bunge leads 2–0 on carpet and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Bettina Bunge won the 1986 Amelia Island second round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 63
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
5
–
0
5 main draw meetings
TCH
Age 65
Left-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 1986* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Bettina Bunge | 6-2 6-1 | Iva Budarova | Match data |
| Mar 12, 1986* | Dallas | WTA 250 | R64 | Carpet | Bettina Bunge | 7-6 6-0 | Iva Budarova | Match data |
| Dec 13, 1984* | Tokyo Pan Pacific | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Bettina Bunge | 6-0 6-1 | Iva Budarova | Match data |
| Aug 31, 1984* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Bettina Bunge | 2-6 7-5 6-1 | Iva Budarova | Match data |
| May 20, 1982* | Berlin | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Bettina Bunge | 6-1 6-2 | Iva Budarova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bettina Bunge | #135 | #8 | 58 | 2,123 | 294 | 182 | 61.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Iva Budarova | #661 | #25 | 9 | 1,859 | 148 | 206 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bettina Bunge | Iva Budarova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1978 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1979 | 16–20 | 44.4% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1980 | 31–23 | 57.4% | — | 1,882 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1981 | 50–23 | 68.5% | — | 2,023 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 15–13 | 53.6% | — | 1,655 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 1982 | 43–21 | 67.2% | — | 2,019 | 0 | 4 | 1980 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 1983 | 26–11 | 70.3% | — | 2,012 | 0 | 5 | 1981 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1984 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #21 | 1,908 | 0 | 5 | 1982 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,656 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1985 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #22 | 1,846 | 0 | 5 | 1983 | 33–23 | 58.9% | — | 1,734 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1986 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #12 | 2,014 | 0 | 5 | 1984 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #56 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1987 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #15 | 1,925 | 0 | 5 | 1985 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #68 | 1,727 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 11–24 | 31.4% | #112 | 1,587 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1989 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #72 | 1,903 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #116 | 1,563 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #105 | 1,586 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,560 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #186 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 |