H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Bettina Bunge vs Kate Latham H2H: 1-1

Bettina Bunge and Kate Latham are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Bettina Bunge leads 1–0 on carpet, while Kate Latham leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kate Latham won the 1981 San Diego quarterfinal 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Bettina Bunge
GER Age 63 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Kate Latham
USA Age 73

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kate Latham 6-2 7-5 Bettina Bunge Match data Aug 1, 1981* QF San Diego WTA 500 Hard
Bettina Bunge 6-1 6-1 Kate Latham Match data Mar 12, 1981* R32 Dallas WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Bettina Bunge #135 #7 58 2,119 294 182 61.8% 0 0 0 1 4 5
Kate Latham — — — 1,864 198 202 49.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Bettina Bunge Kate Latham
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1978 2–2 50.0% — 1,534 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1979 16–20 44.4% — 1,699 0 0 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
17 1980 31–23 57.4% — 1,883 0 0 1970 1–3 25.0% — 1,475 0 0
18 1981 50–23 68.5% #9 2,025 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1982 43–21 67.2% #9 2,009 0 4 1972 3–3 50.0% — 1,502 0 0
20 1983 26–11 70.3% #7 2,009 0 5 1973 6–7 46.2% — 1,587 0 0
21 1984 28–21 57.1% #21 1,908 0 5 1974 40–16 71.4% — 1,828 0 3
22 1985 25–17 59.5% #22 1,846 0 5 1975 15–20 42.9% — 1,684 0 3
23 1986 34–20 63.0% #12 2,015 0 5 1976 4–2 66.7% — 1,676 0 3
24 1987 32–19 62.7% #15 1,935 0 5 1977 15–12 55.6% — 1,748 0 3
25 — — — — — — — 1978 13–17 43.3% — 1,660 0 3
26 1989 7–5 58.3% #72 1,927 0 5 1979 21–23 47.7% — 1,852 0 3
27 — — — — — — — 1980 23–22 51.1% — 1,748 0 4
28 — — — — — — — 1981 21–20 51.2% — 1,774 0 5
29 — — — — — — — 1982 24–28 46.2% — 1,684 0 5
30 — — — — — — — 1983 9–16 36.0% — 1,623 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 1984 0–11 0.0% — 1,492 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 1985 3–1 75.0% — 1,526 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Bettina Bunge Kate Latham
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1978 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1979 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1969 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1980 5 4 9 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 11 10 21 52.4% 1970 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1981 14 6 20 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 25 11 36 69.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1982 6 3 9 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 8 2 10 80.0% 17 11 28 60.7% 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1983 — — — — 10 4 14 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 1973 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% — — — —
21 1984 8 4 12 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 12 6 18 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2% 1974 15 5 20 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 17 6 23 73.9% 0 3 3 0.0%
22 1985 9 5 14 64.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 1975 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
23 1986 8 5 13 61.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 13 8 21 61.9% 1976 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1987 14 5 19 73.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 1977 4 4 8 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
26 1989 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1979 8 7 15 53.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 10 16 37.5%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 9 12 25.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 10 16 37.5%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 9 7 16 56.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 7 9 16 43.8%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 6 8 14 42.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career — 73 41 114 64.0% 55 36 91 60.4% 63 35 98 64.3% 100 70 170 58.8% — 70 67 137 51.1% 26 38 64 40.6% 41 33 74 55.4% 27 55 82 32.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Bettina Bunge Kate Latham
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1978 1534 105.0 — — — — +90 — — 55.6% -0.22 0–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1979 1700 137.5 — — — — -79 -106 +10 45.0% -0.31 5–5 (50%) 4–5 (44%) 104.2 -0.09 1969 1489 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.07
17 1980 1884 156.3 — — — — -86 -197 -78 57.3% +0.69 4–5 (44%) 6–6 (50%) 101.9 -5.90 1970 1476 93.6 — — — — +10 — — 25.0% -2.63 — — — +0.42
18 1981 2025 161.1 — — — — +1 -284 -111 64.3% +1.20 12–7 (63%) 11–2 (85%) 110.3 -3.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1982 2009 161.7 — — — — -23 -181 -42 64.0% +1.24 7–5 (58%) 6–10 (38%) 98.2 -4.38 1972 1503 99.9 — — — — — +39 — 45.5% -0.54 0–1 — — +0.62
20 1983 2010 158.5 — — — — +80 -107 -71 69.6% +1.56 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 -1.99 1973 1587 129.0 — — — — -41 — 0 48.3% +0.14 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.26
21 1984 1909 146.2 — — — — +51 -110 +54 56.4% +0.62 8–6 (57%) 9–5 (64%) 102.9 -3.51 1974 1828 140.0 — — — — -65 -181 -31 68.9% +1.55 6–8 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 99.0 +3.26
22 1985 1846 153.9 — — — — +42 -9 +97 61.1% +1.04 3–5 (38%) 4–6 (40%) 96.3 -2.81 1975 1685 132.9 — — — — +12 -76 — 45.3% -0.03 1–4 (20%) 1–7 (13%) 89.6 -0.75
23 1986 2016 163.2 — — — — +9 -153 -25 59.2% +0.74 11–6 (65%) 8–6 (57%) 106.1 -6.45 1976 1676 107.6 — — — — +22 — — 57.1% +1.00 2–0 1–0 — +2.30
24 1987 1936 153.2 — — — — +61 -100 +11 62.7% +1.05 7–5 (58%) 4–5 (44%) 97.6 -0.82 1977 1749 140.9 — — — — -7 -119 — 54.2% +0.34 3–4 (43%) 4–1 (80%) 103.9 -0.90
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1661 118.3 — — — — +8 -10 +69 43.3% -0.58 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 105.3 +2.03
26 1989 1927 139.0 — — — — +25 — — 57.7% +0.77 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 99.1 -0.43 1979 1852 149.5 — — — — -20 -164 -96 45.5% -0.29 8–7 (53%) 4–4 (50%) 102.4 -2.22
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1749 133.1 — — — — -30 — +16 51.5% +0.05 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 96.7 -1.81
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1774 142.7 — — — — -17 — +6 52.1% +0.14 5–7 (42%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -1.96
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1685 128.0 — — — — +51 -102 +34 44.5% -0.56 10–5 (67%) 5–2 (71%) 106.2 -0.31
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1624 115.0 — — — — +51 -49 +71 40.3% -0.61 7–9 (44%) 3–6 (33%) 96.8 +0.84
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1492 91.5 — — — — +52 +30 — 8.3% -3.08 0–2 0–1 — +0.50
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1527 102.8 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.40 2–0 1–0 — +0.05
Career — 2120 161.9 — — — — +7 -130 -14 60.3% +0.89 62–49 (56%) 57–51 (53%) 105.9 -6.37 — 1864 138.0 — — — — -3 -77 -8 49.1% -0.03 56–62 (47%) 41–38 (52%) 100.8 +0.44

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.