H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Bettina Bunge vs Kate Latham H2H: 1-1
Bettina Bunge and Kate Latham are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Bettina Bunge leads 1–0 on carpet, while Kate Latham leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kate Latham won the 1981 San Diego quarterfinal 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 63
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Age 73
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 1981* | San Diego | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Kate Latham | 6-2 7-5 | Bettina Bunge | Match data |
| Mar 12, 1981* | Dallas | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Bettina Bunge | 6-1 6-1 | Kate Latham | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bettina Bunge | #135 | #8 | 58 | 2,123 | 294 | 182 | 61.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Kate Latham | — | — | — | 1,866 | 198 | 202 | 49.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bettina Bunge | Kate Latham | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1978 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1979 | 16–20 | 44.4% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1980 | 31–23 | 57.4% | — | 1,882 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1981 | 50–23 | 68.5% | — | 2,023 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1982 | 43–21 | 67.2% | — | 2,019 | 0 | 4 | 1972 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1983 | 26–11 | 70.3% | — | 2,012 | 0 | 5 | 1973 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1984 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #21 | 1,908 | 0 | 5 | 1974 | 40–16 | 71.4% | — | 1,844 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1985 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #22 | 1,846 | 0 | 5 | 1975 | 15–20 | 42.9% | — | 1,690 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1986 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #12 | 2,014 | 0 | 5 | 1976 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,680 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1987 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #15 | 1,925 | 0 | 5 | 1977 | 15–12 | 55.6% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1989 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #72 | 1,903 | 0 | 5 | 1979 | 21–23 | 47.7% | — | 1,848 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 23–22 | 51.1% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 24–28 | 46.2% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0–11 | 0.0% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 6 |