H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Bettina Bunge holds a 6–3 lead over Kathy Horvath in their WTA head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, they are tied 3–3 on clay, while Bettina Bunge leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Bettina Bunge won the 1987 Canadian Open round of 16 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bettina Bunge | 6-3 6-2 | Kathy Horvath | Match data | Aug 21, 1987* | R16 | Canadian Open | WTA 500 | Hard |
| Kathy Horvath | 6-1 7-6 | Bettina Bunge | Match data | Jul 12, 1987* | F | Knokke | WTA 250 | Clay |
| Bettina Bunge | 7-5 6-3 | Kathy Horvath | Match data | May 22, 1986* | R32 | Lugano | WTA 250 | Clay |
| Bettina Bunge | 6-0 6-4 | Kathy Horvath | Match data | Jun 29, 1984* | R64 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
| Kathy Horvath | 6-4 7-6 | Bettina Bunge | Match data | May 21, 1983* | QF | Berlin Open | WTA 500 | Clay |
| Bettina Bunge | 7-6 7-5 | Kathy Horvath | Match data | May 21, 1982* | R16 | Berlin Open | WTA 500 | Clay |
| Kathy Horvath | 7-6 6-4 | Bettina Bunge | Match data | Apr 8, 1982* | R32 | Hilton Head | WTA 250 | Clay |
| Bettina Bunge | 6-3 6-3 | Kathy Horvath | Match data | Jan 14, 1982* | R32 | Cincinnati Open | WTA 250 | Carpet |
| Bettina Bunge | 6-3 5-7 6-2 | Kathy Horvath | Match data | May 31, 1981* | R32 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bettina Bunge | #135 | #7 | 58 | 2,119 | 294 | 182 | 61.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Kathy Horvath | #283 | #10 | 24 | 1,975 | 187 | 155 | 54.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bettina Bunge | Kathy Horvath | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1978 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 34–23 | 59.6% | — | 1,858 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | 1979 | 16–20 | 44.4% | — | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 15–17 | 46.9% | — | 1,775 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | 1980 | 31–23 | 57.4% | — | 1,883 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 39–18 | 68.4% | — | 1,930 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | 1981 | 50–23 | 68.5% | #9 | 2,025 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #29 | 1,799 | 0 | 4 |
| 19 | 1982 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #9 | 2,009 | 0 | 4 | 1985 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #34 | 1,775 | 0 | 6 |
| 20 | 1983 | 26–11 | 70.3% | #7 | 2,009 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #47 | 1,739 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | 1984 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #21 | 1,908 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #37 | 1,714 | 0 | 7 |
| 22 | 1985 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #22 | 1,846 | 0 | 5 | 1988 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #85 | 1,602 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 1986 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #12 | 2,015 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #224 | 1,529 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | 1987 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #15 | 1,935 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1989 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #72 | 1,927 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Bettina Bunge | Kathy Horvath | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1978 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 15 | 8 | 23 | 65.2% | — | — | — | — | 12 | 11 | 23 | 52.2% |
| 16 | 1979 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 1982 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 13 | 6 | 19 | 68.4% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% |
| 17 | 1980 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 11 | 10 | 21 | 52.4% | 1983 | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 21 | 11 | 32 | 65.6% | — | — | — | — | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% |
| 18 | 1981 | 14 | 6 | 20 | 70.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 25 | 11 | 36 | 69.4% | 1984 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 21 | 9 | 30 | 70.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% |
| 19 | 1982 | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 17 | 11 | 28 | 60.7% | 1985 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 17 | 7 | 24 | 70.8% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% |
| 20 | 1983 | — | — | — | — | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 13 | 5 | 18 | 72.2% | 1986 | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 21 | 1984 | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 1987 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 12 | 8 | 20 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1985 | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1988 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1986 | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 13 | 8 | 21 | 61.9% | 1989 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1987 | 14 | 5 | 19 | 73.7% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1989 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 73 | 41 | 114 | 64.0% | 55 | 36 | 91 | 60.4% | 63 | 35 | 98 | 64.3% | 100 | 70 | 170 | 58.8% | — | 45 | 50 | 95 | 47.4% | 111 | 67 | 178 | 62.4% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 28 | 32 | 60 | 46.7% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Bettina Bunge | Kathy Horvath | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1497 | 113.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.0% | -2.20 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.25 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1563 | 110.2 | — | — | — | — | +45 | -63 | — | 43.3% | -0.37 | 3–1 (75%) | 1–3 (25%) | 102.0 | -0.09 |
| 15 | 1978 | 1534 | 105.0 | — | — | — | — | +90 | — | — | 55.6% | -0.22 | 0–1 | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.04 | 1981 | 1859 | 146.5 | — | — | — | — | -40 | -79 | — | 56.3% | +0.44 | 11–7 (61%) | 7–5 (58%) | 108.4 | +0.14 |
| 16 | 1979 | 1700 | 137.5 | — | — | — | — | -79 | -106 | +10 | 45.0% | -0.31 | 5–5 (50%) | 4–5 (44%) | 104.2 | -0.09 | 1982 | 1775 | 143.3 | — | — | — | — | -40 | +62 | — | 52.9% | +0.46 | 1–7 (13%) | 2–3 (40%) | 92.6 | -4.36 |
| 17 | 1980 | 1884 | 156.3 | — | — | — | — | -86 | -197 | -78 | 57.3% | +0.69 | 4–5 (44%) | 6–6 (50%) | 101.9 | -5.90 | 1983 | 1931 | 149.2 | — | — | — | — | -65 | +55 | — | 63.7% | +0.74 | 9–3 (75%) | 11–6 (65%) | 109.3 | +1.14 |
| 18 | 1981 | 2025 | 161.1 | — | — | — | — | +1 | -284 | -111 | 64.3% | +1.20 | 12–7 (63%) | 11–2 (85%) | 110.3 | -3.78 | 1984 | 1799 | 146.8 | — | — | — | — | -83 | +206 | — | 56.1% | +0.43 | 5–5 (50%) | 3–7 (30%) | 94.7 | +0.34 |
| 19 | 1982 | 2009 | 161.7 | — | — | — | — | -23 | -181 | -42 | 64.0% | +1.24 | 7–5 (58%) | 6–10 (38%) | 98.2 | -4.38 | 1985 | 1776 | 138.0 | — | — | — | — | -112 | +220 | — | 55.8% | +0.24 | 6–2 (75%) | 5–2 (71%) | 104.1 | -0.67 |
| 20 | 1983 | 2010 | 158.5 | — | — | — | — | +80 | -107 | -71 | 69.6% | +1.56 | 2–3 (40%) | 2–2 (50%) | 97.6 | -1.99 | 1986 | 1740 | 130.3 | — | — | — | — | -73 | +184 | -140 | 48.6% | -0.18 | 7–3 (70%) | 3–3 (50%) | 104.3 | -1.58 |
| 21 | 1984 | 1909 | 146.2 | — | — | — | — | +51 | -110 | +54 | 56.4% | +0.62 | 8–6 (57%) | 9–5 (64%) | 102.9 | -3.51 | 1987 | 1714 | 125.9 | — | — | — | — | -43 | +149 | — | 54.1% | +0.18 | 6–4 (60%) | 3–2 (60%) | 101.2 | +3.16 |
| 22 | 1985 | 1846 | 153.9 | — | — | — | — | +42 | -9 | +97 | 61.1% | +1.04 | 3–5 (38%) | 4–6 (40%) | 96.3 | -2.81 | 1988 | 1603 | 116.3 | — | — | — | — | +7 | +113 | — | 41.5% | -0.64 | 1–4 (20%) | 2–2 (50%) | 94.3 | +0.35 |
| 23 | 1986 | 2016 | 163.2 | — | — | — | — | +9 | -153 | -25 | 59.2% | +0.74 | 11–6 (65%) | 8–6 (57%) | 106.1 | -6.45 | 1989 | 1530 | 101.0 | — | — | — | — | +17 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.38 | 0–3 (0%) | 2–2 (50%) | 95.4 | +0.29 |
| 24 | 1987 | 1936 | 153.2 | — | — | — | — | +61 | -100 | +11 | 62.7% | +1.05 | 7–5 (58%) | 4–5 (44%) | 97.6 | -0.82 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1989 | 1927 | 139.0 | — | — | — | — | +25 | — | — | 57.7% | +0.77 | 3–1 (75%) | 1–3 (25%) | 99.1 | -0.43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 2120 | 161.9 | — | — | — | — | +7 | -130 | -14 | 60.3% | +0.89 | 62–49 (56%) | 57–51 (53%) | 105.9 | -6.37 | — | 1976 | 144.0 | — | — | — | — | -49 | +106 | -140 | 53.7% | +0.21 | 49–40 (55%) | 39–36 (52%) | 103.2 | -0.45 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hana Mandlikova | 1 | 15 | 16 | Feb 27, 1987 | H2H |
| Martina Navratilova | 0 | 16 | 16 | Nov 17, 1986 | H2H |
| Pam Shriver | 4 | 11 | 15 | Nov 7, 1987 | H2H |
| Chris Evert | 0 | 13 | 13 | Apr 11, 1987 | H2H |
| Sue Barker | 6 | 5 | 11 | Apr 15, 1983 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martina Navratilova | 1 | 10 | 11 | Apr 16, 1988 | H2H |
| Bettina Bunge | 3 | 6 | 9 | Aug 21, 1987 | H2H |
| Virginia Ruzici | 4 | 5 | 9 | May 29, 1985 | H2H |
| Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | 5 | 4 | 9 | Jan 24, 1985 | H2H |
| Chris Evert | 0 | 7 | 7 | Jun 29, 1986 | H2H |