H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Bettina Bunge vs Lea Antonoplis H2H: 2-0
Bettina Bunge holds a 2–0 lead over Lea Antonoplis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Bettina Bunge leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Bettina Bunge won the 1984 Sydney third round 6-0 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 63
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 67
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 1984* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Bettina Bunge | 6-0 6-0 | Lea Antonoplis | Match data |
| Feb 19, 1982* | Houston | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Bettina Bunge | 6-3 6-0 | Lea Antonoplis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bettina Bunge | #135 | #8 | 58 | 2,123 | 294 | 182 | 61.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Lea Antonoplis | #599 | #66 | 6 | 1,774 | 126 | 176 | 41.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bettina Bunge | Lea Antonoplis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 8–3 | 72.7% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1978 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1979 | 16–20 | 44.4% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1980 | 31–23 | 57.4% | — | 1,882 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 7–6 | 53.8% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1981 | 50–23 | 68.5% | — | 2,023 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1982 | 43–21 | 67.2% | — | 2,019 | 0 | 4 | 1978 | 17–20 | 45.9% | — | 1,717 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1983 | 26–11 | 70.3% | — | 2,012 | 0 | 5 | 1979 | 11–13 | 45.8% | — | 1,724 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1984 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #21 | 1,908 | 0 | 5 | 1980 | 14–7 | 66.7% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1985 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #22 | 1,846 | 0 | 5 | 1981 | 9–11 | 45.0% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1986 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #12 | 2,014 | 0 | 5 | 1982 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,632 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1987 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #15 | 1,925 | 0 | 5 | 1983 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #71 | 1,583 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1989 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #72 | 1,903 | 0 | 5 | 1985 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #66 | 1,572 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #176 | 1,460 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #163 | 1,413 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #142 | 1,455 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #210 | 1,448 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #599 | 1,432 | 0 | 2 |