H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Bettina Bunge vs Lea Antonoplis H2H: 2-0

Bettina Bunge holds a 2–0 lead over Lea Antonoplis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Bettina Bunge leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Bettina Bunge won the 1984 Sydney International round of 32 6-0 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Bettina Bunge
GER Age 63 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Lea Antonoplis
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Bettina Bunge #26 6-0 6-0 Lea Antonoplis #102 Match data Nov 22, 1984* R32 Sydney International WTA 500 Grass
Bettina Bunge 6-3 6-0 Lea Antonoplis Match data Feb 19, 1982* R16 Houston WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Bettina Bunge — #7 58 2,121 294 182 61.8% 0 0 0 1 4 5
Lea Antonoplis — #66 6 1,771 129 177 42.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Bettina Bunge Lea Antonoplis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1973 8–3 72.7% — 1,578 0 0
15 1978 2–2 50.0% — 1,533 0 0 1974 2–5 28.6% — 1,532 0 0
16 1979 16–20 44.4% — 1,699 0 0 1975 3–4 42.9% — 1,560 0 0
17 1980 31–23 57.4% — 1,885 0 0 1976 7–6 53.8% — 1,610 0 0
18 1981 50–23 68.5% #9 2,027 0 0 1977 6–4 60.0% — 1,652 0 0
19 1982 43–21 67.2% #9 2,011 0 4 1978 20–21 48.8% — 1,721 0 0
20 1983 26–11 70.3% #7 2,010 0 5 1979 11–13 45.8% — 1,726 0 1
21 1984 28–21 57.1% #21 1,909 0 5 1980 14–7 66.7% — 1,733 0 2
22 1985 25–17 59.5% — 1,846 0 5 1981 9–11 45.0% — 1,718 0 2
23 1986 34–20 63.0% #12 2,016 0 5 1982 8–18 30.8% — 1,632 0 2
24 1987 32–19 62.7% #15 1,936 0 5 1983 6–13 31.6% — 1,568 0 2
25 — — — — — — — 1984 8–11 42.1% #71 1,583 0 2
26 1989 7–5 58.3% #72 1,927 0 5 1985 14–21 40.0% — 1,571 0 2
27 — — — — — — — 1986 2–14 12.5% #176 1,459 0 2
28 — — — — — — — 1987 3–9 25.0% #163 1,412 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 1988 5–9 35.7% #142 1,454 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 1989 3–7 30.0% #210 1,447 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% — 1,431 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Bettina Bunge Lea Antonoplis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1978 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
16 1979 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1975 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1980 5 4 9 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 11 10 21 52.4% 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
18 1981 14 6 20 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 25 11 36 69.4% 1977 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1982 6 3 9 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 8 2 10 80.0% 17 11 28 60.7% 1978 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 6 9 33.3%
20 1983 — — — — 10 4 14 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 1984 8 4 12 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 12 6 18 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2% 1980 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
22 1985 9 5 14 64.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 1981 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1986 8 5 13 61.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 13 8 21 61.9% 1982 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5%
24 1987 14 5 19 73.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 1983 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 1989 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1985 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 5 6 11 45.5% 1 5 6 16.7%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 73 41 114 64.0% 55 36 91 60.4% 63 35 98 64.3% 100 70 170 58.8% — 48 73 121 39.7% 8 13 21 38.1% 48 50 98 49.0% 12 34 46 26.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Bettina Bunge Lea Antonoplis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1579 109.5 — — — — +107 — — 69.6% +0.70 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +3.55
15 1978 1533 104.3 — — — — +86 — — 55.6% -0.22 0–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.06 1974 1532 101.9 — — — — +96 — +11 41.2% -0.65 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +1.36
16 1979 1699 137.7 — — — — -79 -104 +10 45.0% -0.31 5–5 (50%) 4–5 (44%) 104.2 +0.20 1975 1560 116.0 — — — — +137 — — 41.2% -0.41 2–1 (67%) — — +0.22
17 1980 1885 156.5 — — — — -84 -197 -79 57.3% +0.69 4–5 (44%) 6–6 (50%) 102.0 -5.93 1976 1610 115.7 — — — — +32 -29 -15 48.0% -0.16 1–0 0–1 — +0.92
18 1981 2027 161.4 — — — — 0 -285 -113 64.3% +1.20 12–7 (63%) 11–2 (85%) 110.3 -3.43 1977 1653 115.1 — — — — -4 — -31 62.5% +0.67 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +1.95
19 1982 2011 162.0 — — — — -24 -182 -43 64.0% +1.24 7–5 (58%) 6–10 (38%) 98.2 -3.95 1978 1722 133.3 — — — — -57 — +32 50.5% +0.05 11–8 (58%) 8–6 (57%) 104.9 +1.83
20 1983 2011 158.7 — — — — +80 -107 -72 69.6% +1.56 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 -1.66 1979 1727 130.8 — — — — -81 — +4 47.5% -0.54 5–6 (45%) 8–4 (67%) 101.1 -0.98
21 1984 1909 146.3 — — — — +51 -109 +54 56.4% +0.62 8–6 (57%) 9–5 (64%) 102.9 -3.24 1980 1734 123.6 — — — — -96 — +60 63.3% +0.80 4–3 (57%) 0–3 (0%) 98.2 +1.54
22 1985 1847 154.1 — — — — +42 -10 +97 61.1% +1.04 3–5 (38%) 4–6 (40%) 96.3 -2.92 1981 1719 116.7 — — — — -93 — +93 43.2% -0.91 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.94
23 1986 2016 163.3 — — — — +9 -153 -24 59.2% +0.74 11–6 (65%) 8–6 (57%) 106.1 -5.55 1982 1633 114.8 — — — — -126 — +169 37.7% -1.00 2–7 (22%) 3–5 (38%) 93.4 +1.13
24 1987 1936 153.3 — — — — +62 -100 +10 62.7% +1.05 7–5 (58%) 4–5 (44%) 97.6 -1.05 1983 1568 97.9 — — — — -31 +19 +128 32.6% -1.30 3–2 (60%) — — +0.41
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1584 111.1 — — — — -39 — +94 41.9% -0.67 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 99.4 +2.44
26 1989 1928 139.1 — — — — +25 — — 57.7% +0.77 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 99.1 -0.42 1985 1571 120.2 — — — — -36 — +95 41.3% -0.55 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 +2.18
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1459 102.2 — — — — -13 — +165 26.3% -1.26 0–6 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 90.9 +0.87
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1412 91.8 — — — — -5 +47 — 34.5% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 +1.66
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1454 110.8 — — — — -65 — +173 44.1% -0.91 1–5 (17%) 2–3 (40%) 97.2 +0.65
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1447 110.4 — — — — -12 — — 33.3% -0.58 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — +0.77
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1431 95.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.21
Career — 2121 162.0 — — — — +7 -130 -15 60.3% +0.89 62–49 (56%) 57–51 (53%) 105.8 -5.90 — 1772 122.0 — — — — -33 +2 +75 44.4% -0.47 45–60 (43%) 34–41 (45%) 95.8 +6.50

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.