H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Bettina Bunge vs Mary Lou Piatek H2H: 6-0
Bettina Bunge holds a 6–0 lead over Mary Lou Piatek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Bettina Bunge leads 3–0 on carpet and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bettina Bunge won the 1987 US Open first round 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 1987* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Bettina Bunge | 6-3 7-5 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data |
| Feb 17, 1983* | Chicago | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Bettina Bunge | 7-6 6-4 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data |
| Apr 29, 1982* | Orlando | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Bettina Bunge | 6-3 7-5 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data |
| Feb 20, 1982* | Houston | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Bettina Bunge | 6-4 6-3 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data |
| Jan 15, 1982* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R16 | Carpet | Bettina Bunge | 6-1 6-4 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data |
| Oct 10, 1981* | Tampa | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Bettina Bunge | 4-6 6-3 6-2 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bettina Bunge | #135 | #8 | 58 | 2,123 | 294 | 182 | 61.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Mary Lou Piatek | — | — | — | 1,936 | 153 | 206 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Bettina Bunge | Mary Lou Piatek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1978 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 16–20 | 44.4% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 31–23 | 57.4% | — | 1,882 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 16–12 | 57.1% | — | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 50–23 | 68.5% | — | 2,023 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 1 |
| 1982 | 43–21 | 67.2% | — | 2,019 | 0 | 4 | 1982 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,792 | 0 | 1 |
| 1983 | 26–11 | 70.3% | — | 2,012 | 0 | 5 | 1983 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 1 |
| 1984 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #21 | 1,908 | 0 | 5 | 1984 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 2 |
| 1985 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #22 | 1,846 | 0 | 5 | 1985 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 1986 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #12 | 2,014 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 2 |
| 1987 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #15 | 1,925 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 2 |
| 1989 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #72 | 1,903 | 0 | 5 | 1988 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 2 |