H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Bettina Bunge vs Nathalie Herreman H2H: 1-0

Bettina Bunge holds a 1–0 lead over Nathalie Herreman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Bettina Bunge leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Bettina Bunge won the 1987 Knokke semifinal 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Bettina Bunge
GER Age 63 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Nathalie Herreman
FRA Age 60 Left-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Bettina Bunge #12 7-5 6-2 Nathalie Herreman #64 Match data Jul 11, 1987* SF Knokke WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Bettina Bunge #135 #7 58 2,119 294 182 61.8% 0 0 0 1 4 5
Nathalie Herreman #886 #42 20 1,727 103 154 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Bettina Bunge Nathalie Herreman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1978 2–2 50.0% — 1,534 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1979 16–20 44.4% — 1,699 0 0 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0
17 1980 31–23 57.4% — 1,883 0 0 1983 4–3 57.1% — 1,547 0 0
18 1981 50–23 68.5% #9 2,025 0 0 1984 8–12 40.0% #125 1,563 0 0
19 1982 43–21 67.2% #9 2,009 0 4 1985 3–6 33.3% #126 1,542 0 0
20 1983 26–11 70.3% #7 2,009 0 5 1986 16–11 59.3% #42 1,717 0 1
21 1984 28–21 57.1% #21 1,908 0 5 1987 11–20 35.5% #91 1,640 0 1
22 1985 25–17 59.5% #22 1,846 0 5 1988 8–12 40.0% #95 1,605 0 1
23 1986 34–20 63.0% #12 2,015 0 5 1989 8–17 32.0% #134 1,568 0 1
24 1987 32–19 62.7% #15 1,935 0 5 1990 19–20 48.7% #62 1,683 0 1
25 — — — — — — — 1991 12–21 36.4% #121 1,618 0 1
26 1989 7–5 58.3% #72 1,927 0 5 1992 6–16 27.3% #183 1,556 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 1993 7–9 43.8% #107 1,623 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 1994 1–5 16.7% #181 1,584 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 1995 0–1 0.0% #386 1,580 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Bettina Bunge Nathalie Herreman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1978 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1979 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1982 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
17 1980 5 4 9 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 11 10 21 52.4% 1983 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1981 14 6 20 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 25 11 36 69.4% 1984 4 4 8 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1982 6 3 9 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 8 2 10 80.0% 17 11 28 60.7% 1985 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1983 — — — — 10 4 14 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 1986 1 3 4 25.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
21 1984 8 4 12 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 12 6 18 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2% 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1985 9 5 14 64.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 1988 4 4 8 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1986 8 5 13 61.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 13 8 21 61.9% 1989 6 7 13 46.2% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1987 14 5 19 73.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 4 11 15 26.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 1989 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1992 1 4 5 20.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 5 7 12 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 73 41 114 64.0% 55 36 91 60.4% 63 35 98 64.3% 100 70 170 58.8% — 41 59 100 41.0% 34 55 89 38.2% 8 16 24 33.3% 20 24 44 45.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Bettina Bunge Nathalie Herreman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1978 1534 105.0 — — — — +90 — — 55.6% -0.22 0–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1979 1700 137.5 — — — — -79 -106 +10 45.0% -0.31 5–5 (50%) 4–5 (44%) 104.2 -0.09 1982 1492 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.01
17 1980 1884 156.3 — — — — -86 -197 -78 57.3% +0.69 4–5 (44%) 6–6 (50%) 101.9 -5.90 1983 1548 103.2 — — — — — +61 — 50.0% -0.31 2–0 1–0 — +0.65
18 1981 2025 161.1 — — — — +1 -284 -111 64.3% +1.20 12–7 (63%) 11–2 (85%) 110.3 -3.78 1984 1564 106.0 — — — — +9 +37 — 41.9% -0.81 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.3 +1.16
19 1982 2009 161.7 — — — — -23 -181 -42 64.0% +1.24 7–5 (58%) 6–10 (38%) 98.2 -4.38 1985 1543 100.6 — — — — — -28 — 40.0% -1.30 0–2 — — +0.91
20 1983 2010 158.5 — — — — +80 -107 -71 69.6% +1.56 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 -1.99 1986 1718 137.8 — — — — -77 -14 — 62.1% +0.93 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 100.4 +1.39
21 1984 1909 146.2 — — — — +51 -110 +54 56.4% +0.62 8–6 (57%) 9–5 (64%) 102.9 -3.51 1987 1641 121.1 — — — — -12 -7 — 40.8% -0.90 2–7 (22%) 5–2 (71%) 95.4 +0.60
22 1985 1846 153.9 — — — — +42 -9 +97 61.1% +1.04 3–5 (38%) 4–6 (40%) 96.3 -2.81 1988 1606 116.4 — — — — +37 -63 -63 46.2% -0.48 4–8 (33%) 0–1 — +0.90
23 1986 2016 163.2 — — — — +9 -153 -25 59.2% +0.74 11–6 (65%) 8–6 (57%) 106.1 -6.45 1989 1568 127.3 — — — — +91 -64 — 36.4% -0.73 1–4 (20%) 0–6 (0%) 92.4 -0.56
24 1987 1936 153.2 — — — — +61 -100 +11 62.7% +1.05 7–5 (58%) 4–5 (44%) 97.6 -0.82 1990 1683 140.3 — — — — +41 -156 -113 48.3% -0.24 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 103.4 -1.70
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1618 118.4 — — — — +27 -109 -32 38.7% -0.83 4–5 (44%) 3–2 (60%) 100.4 -0.07
26 1989 1927 139.0 — — — — +25 — — 57.7% +0.77 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 99.1 -0.43 1992 1556 118.1 — — — — +62 -82 — 34.7% -1.06 0–5 (0%) 0–1 — -0.27
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1623 124.9 — — — — +8 -99 — 41.2% -1.18 2–0 1–0 — -0.45
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1585 103.8 — — — — +19 -41 — 21.4% -3.00 1–1 1–0 — -0.34
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1581 100.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.22
Career — 2120 161.9 — — — — +7 -130 -14 60.3% +0.89 62–49 (56%) 57–51 (53%) 105.9 -6.37 — 1727 129.0 — — — — +25 -47 -76 42.9% -0.64 24–42 (36%) 16–19 (46%) 93.0 +0.77

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.