H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Bettina Fulco vs Patricia Medrado H2H: 1-2
Patricia Medrado holds a 2–1 lead over Bettina Fulco in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Patricia Medrado leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bettina Fulco won the 1988 Barcelona quarterfinal 3-6 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 1988* | Barcelona | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Bettina Fulco | 3-6 6-4 6-3 | Patricia Medrado | Match data |
| Dec 12, 1987* | Guaruja | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Patricia Medrado | 6-4 6-1 | Bettina Fulco | Match data |
| Sep 25, 1986* | Tulsa | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Patricia Medrado | 6-2 6-3 | Bettina Fulco | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bettina Fulco | #770 | #23 | 197 | 1,873 | 139 | 152 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Patricia Medrado | #359 | #67 | 9 | 1,837 | 152 | 163 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bettina Fulco | Patricia Medrado | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1986 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #116 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1987 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #40 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #24 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #47 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1990 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #131 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1991 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #76 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1992 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #83 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 22–10 | 68.8% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1993 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #290 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 38–20 | 65.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 1994 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #88 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 33–25 | 56.9% | — | 1,779 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1995 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #142 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 4–18 | 18.2% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | 1996 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #133 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #108 | 1,588 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #108 | 1,542 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #76 | 1,562 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #117 | 1,552 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #180 | 1,474 | 0 | 10 |