H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Betty Stove vs Patricia Medrado H2H: 1-0
Betty Stove holds a 1–0 lead over Patricia Medrado in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Betty Stove leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Betty Stove won the 1981 Toronto second round 1-6 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 81
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 69
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 1981 | Toronto | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Betty Stove | 1-6 6-2 6-3 | Patricia Medrado | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Betty Stove | — | — | — | 2,165 | 413 | 304 | 57.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Patricia Medrado | #359 | #67 | 9 | 1,837 | 152 | 163 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Betty Stove | Patricia Medrado | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 22–10 | 68.8% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1969 | 27–14 | 65.9% | — | 1,616 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 38–20 | 65.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 1970 | 16–19 | 45.7% | — | 1,694 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 33–25 | 56.9% | — | 1,779 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1971 | 48–28 | 63.2% | — | 1,791 | 0 | 4 | 1983 | 4–18 | 18.2% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | 1972 | 46–25 | 64.8% | — | 1,959 | 0 | 6 | 1984 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #108 | 1,588 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 1973 | 37–27 | 57.8% | — | 1,921 | 0 | 7 | 1985 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #108 | 1,542 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 1974 | 24–20 | 54.5% | — | 1,954 | 0 | 7 | 1986 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #76 | 1,562 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 1975 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,953 | 0 | 7 | 1987 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #117 | 1,552 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | 1976 | 37–20 | 64.9% | — | 2,076 | 0 | 7 | 1988 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #180 | 1,474 | 0 | 10 |
| 32 | 1977 | 46–25 | 64.8% | — | 2,069 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1978 | 51–24 | 68.0% | — | 2,090 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1979 | 26–24 | 52.0% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1980 | 24–23 | 51.1% | — | 1,862 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1981 | 5–20 | 20.0% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1982 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,676 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1983 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |