H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Betty Stove vs Yvonne Vermaak H2H: 4-1
Betty Stove holds a 4–1 lead over Yvonne Vermaak in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Betty Stove leads 2–1 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Betty Stove won the 1980 Eastbourne third round 6-2 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 81
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
4
–
1
5 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 69
Right-Handed
155 cm / 5'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 1980* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Betty Stove | 6-2 7-6 | Yvonne Vermaak | Match data |
| Feb 21, 1980* | Detroit | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Betty Stove | 6-3 7-6 | Yvonne Vermaak | Match data |
| Mar 30, 1978* | Philadelphia | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Betty Stove | 6-7 6-1 6-3 | Yvonne Vermaak | Match data |
| Mar 4, 1977* | San Francisco | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Betty Stove | 6-0 6-2 | Yvonne Vermaak | Match data |
| Feb 26, 1977* | Detroit | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Yvonne Vermaak | 6-7 6-4 6-2 | Betty Stove | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Betty Stove | — | — | — | 2,165 | 413 | 304 | 57.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Yvonne Vermaak | #558 | #38 | 10 | 1,891 | 239 | 249 | 49.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Betty Stove | Yvonne Vermaak | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 15–12 | 55.6% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 8–10 | 44.4% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 20–14 | 58.8% | — | 1,766 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 29–23 | 55.8% | — | 1,797 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 15–23 | 39.5% | — | 1,781 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 19–18 | 51.4% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1969 | 27–14 | 65.9% | — | 1,616 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 19–28 | 40.4% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1970 | 16–19 | 45.7% | — | 1,694 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 36–27 | 57.1% | — | 1,819 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1971 | 48–28 | 63.2% | — | 1,791 | 0 | 4 | 1983 | 33–26 | 55.9% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1972 | 46–25 | 64.8% | — | 1,959 | 0 | 6 | 1984 | 29–28 | 50.9% | #41 | 1,801 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1973 | 37–27 | 57.8% | — | 1,921 | 0 | 7 | 1985 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #41 | 1,605 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 1974 | 24–20 | 54.5% | — | 1,954 | 0 | 7 | 1986 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #104 | 1,565 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 1975 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,953 | 0 | 7 | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #201 | 1,558 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 1976 | 37–20 | 64.9% | — | 2,076 | 0 | 7 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,542 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 1977 | 46–25 | 64.8% | — | 2,069 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1978 | 51–24 | 68.0% | — | 2,090 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1979 | 26–24 | 52.0% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1980 | 24–23 | 51.1% | — | 1,862 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1981 | 5–20 | 20.0% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1982 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,676 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1983 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |