H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Beverly Bowes vs Pam Casale H2H: 1-0

Beverly Bowes holds a 1–0 lead over Pam Casale in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Beverly Bowes leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Beverly Bowes won the 1988 Amelia Island round of 64 6-2 3-6 6-3.

USA Age 61 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings
USA Age 62 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Beverly Bowes #82 6-2 3-6 6-3 Pam Casale #116 Match data Apr 13, 1988* R64 Amelia Island Category 5 modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Beverly Bowes #597 #49 16 1,676 69 120 36.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pam Casale #671 #14 22 1,944 168 147 53.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Beverly Bowes Pam Casale
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1980 15–10 60.0% 1,597 0 0
17 1983 3–6 33.3% 1,526 0 0 1981 30–17 63.8% 1,810 0 0
18 1984 1–5 16.7% #161 1,482 0 0 1982 20–23 46.5% 1,745 0 0
19 1985 6–6 50.0% #170 1,526 0 0 1983 23–20 53.5% 1,770 0 0
20 1986 6–8 42.9% #100 1,585 0 0 1984 31–17 64.6% #15 1,914 0 0
21 1987 7–18 28.0% #75 1,590 0 0 1985 24–20 54.5% #14 1,814 0 0
22 1988 14–19 42.4% #62 1,639 0 0 1986 16–17 48.5% #41 1,787 0 0
23 1989 13–19 40.6% #101 1,618 0 0 1987 5–11 31.2% #111 1,673 0 0
24 1990 5–13 27.8% #147 1,536 0 0 1988 4–10 28.6% #169 1,552 0 0
25 1991 2–5 28.6% #156 1,520 0 0 1989 0–1 0.0% #225 1,547 0 0
26 1992 3–8 27.3% #113 1,510 0 0 1990 0–1 0.0% #554 1,525 0 0
27 1993 8–11 42.1% #130 1,551 0 0
28 1994 1–2 33.3% #426 1,557 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Beverly Bowes Pam Casale
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1980 8 7 15 53.3%
17 1983 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1981 17 6 23 73.9% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0%
18 1984 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 10 16 37.5%
19 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1983 5 5 10 50.0% 13 8 21 61.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
20 1986 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 8 3 11 72.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 6 17 64.7%
21 1987 2 6 8 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 1985 17 7 24 70.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
22 1988 11 13 24 45.8% 3 6 9 33.3% 1986 3 6 9 33.3% 11 5 16 68.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
23 1989 12 13 25 48.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1990 3 8 11 27.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1988 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1989 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1992 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1993 5 6 11 45.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 1994 1 2 3 33.3%
Career 44 66 110 40.0% 19 33 52 36.5% 1 11 12 8.3% 2 8 10 20.0% 66 49 115 57.4% 55 41 96 57.3% 15 19 34 44.1% 25 35 60 41.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Beverly Bowes Pam Casale
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1980 1598 118.7 +29 57.4% +0.72 3–3 (50%) 1–1 +2.02
17 1983 1527 109.4 +94 36.4% -1.36 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.4 -0.02 1981 1811 140.3 -1 -153 -196 64.1% +1.03 3–6 (33%) 6–0 (100%) 101.9 +1.97
18 1984 1483 102.6 +16 28.6% -1.50 0–2 +0.56 1982 1745 140.3 -54 -4 -106 50.5% +0.01 1–8 (11%) 9–5 (64%) 95.5 -3.37
19 1985 1526 113.9 -36 +84 50.0% +0.12 1–1 1–1 +0.37 1983 1770 144.1 -55 +93 -103 52.1% +0.47 5–3 (63%) 3–3 (50%) 102.6 -1.57
20 1986 1585 113.1 -13 44.8% -0.52 2–1 (67%) 1–0 +0.61 1984 1914 155.3 +6 -60 -210 64.8% +1.01 3–6 (33%) 7–3 (70%) 100.3 -2.46
21 1987 1590 126.7 -36 +54 -102 32.1% -1.34 4–4 (50%) 0–4 (0%) 99.5 -1.69 1985 1814 137.6 +80 -54 -188 53.1% +0.34 6–4 (60%) 3–3 (50%) 98.8 -1.08
22 1988 1640 128.2 -42 -20 44.4% -0.44 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.1 -0.80 1986 1788 137.1 -56 +52 46.8% -0.18 7–4 (64%) 6–3 (67%) 103.7 -3.63
23 1989 1618 121.7 +15 -8 43.6% -0.61 6–8 (43%) 1–3 (25%) 97.1 +0.13 1987 1673 114.3 -20 -77 41.7% -0.56 3–5 (38%) 2–1 (67%) -0.50
24 1990 1537 112.4 +27 +14 34.8% -0.67 4–6 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 95.7 +0.22 1988 1552 100.5 +25 +207 36.4% -0.79 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 92.4 +1.01
25 1991 1521 98.6 +25 -2 35.3% -1.35 1–2 (33%) +0.30 1989 1547 93.6 0.0% -5.50 -0.21
26 1992 1511 111.3 +22 +24 32.0% -1.16 1–2 (33%) 0–1 -0.14 1990 1526 90.6 0.0% -5.00 +0.21
27 1993 1552 118.8 +24 -12 42.9% -0.50 2–2 (50%) +0.50
28 1994 1558 112.1 +22 28.6% -2.43 1–0 -0.33
Career 1677 124.6 -4 +21 -102 39.6% -0.78 26–34 (43%) 8–18 (31%) 93.9 -0.15 1944 143.5 +1 +5 -153 53.9% +0.36 32–43 (43%) 38–21 (64%) 100.1 -2.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.