H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Billie Jean King vs Hana Mandlikova H2H: 2-2

Billie Jean King and Hana Mandlikova are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Hana Mandlikova leads 2–0 on clay, while Billie Jean King leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Hana Mandlikova won the 1983 Orlando quarterfinal 6-3 2-6 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Billie Jean King
Age 82 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Hana Mandlikova
AUS Age 64 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 23, 1983* Orlando WTA 250 QF Clay Hana Mandlikova 6-3 2-6 7-5 Billie Jean King Match data
May 8, 1982* Perugia WTA 250 SF Clay Hana Mandlikova 3-6 6-1 6-3 Billie Jean King Match data
Nov 3, 1979* Stockholm WTA 250 QF Hard Billie Jean King 6-4 7-6(3) Hana Mandlikova Match data
Jul 4, 1979* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Billie Jean King 6-4 6-3 Hana Mandlikova Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Billie Jean King #22 #13 — 2,402 684 160 81.0% 9 1 0 3 59 72
Hana Mandlikova #31 #3 157 2,299 516 191 73.0% 4 0 0 3 18 25

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Billie Jean King Hana Mandlikova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1978 22–8 73.3% — 1,750 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 1979 36–14 72.0% — 1,985 0 5
18 — — — — — — — 1980 76–17 81.7% — 2,230 1 11
19 — — — — — — — 1981 56–24 70.0% — 2,108 2 14
20 — — — — — — — 1982 35–19 64.8% — 1,998 2 14
21 — — — — — — — 1983 44–21 67.7% — 1,977 2 14
22 — — — — — — — 1984 47–11 81.0% #3 2,081 2 19
23 — — — — — — — 1985 53–13 80.3% #3 2,210 3 22
24 1968 40–5 88.9% — 1,823 2 6 1986 44–15 74.6% #4 2,233 3 22
25 1969 58–14 80.6% — 2,043 2 11 1987 47–13 78.3% #5 2,136 4 25
26 1970 47–11 81.0% — 2,172 2 16 1988 15–7 68.2% #29 2,031 4 25
27 1971 114–15 88.4% — 2,293 3 33 1989 33–19 63.5% #14 1,941 4 25
28 1972 89–15 85.6% — 2,341 6 43 1990 8–9 47.1% #31 1,809 4 25
29 1973 56–12 82.4% — 2,294 7 50 — — — — — — —
30 1974 54–8 87.1% — 2,300 8 56 — — — — — — —
31 1975 23–3 88.5% — 2,370 9 58 — — — — — — —
32 1976 2–2 50.0% — 2,316 9 58 — — — — — — —
33 1977 46–6 88.5% — 2,386 9 64 — — — — — — —
34 1978 28–12 70.0% — 2,301 9 64 — — — — — — —
35 1979 36–13 73.5% — 2,164 9 66 — — — — — — —
36 1980 39–15 72.2% — 2,122 9 69 — — — — — — —
37 1981 4–5 44.4% — 2,019 9 69 — — — — — — —
38 1982 26–19 57.8% — 1,932 9 70 — — — — — — —
39 1983 22–5 81.5% — 2,052 9 72 — — — — — — —