H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Billie Jean King vs Pam Casale H2H: 2-1

Billie Jean King holds a 2–1 lead over Pam Casale in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Billie Jean King leads 1–0 on carpet, while Pam Casale leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Billie Jean King won the 1983 Birmingham third round 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Billie Jean King
Age 82 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Pam Casale
USA Age 62 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 6, 1983* Birmingham WTA 250 R32 Grass Billie Jean King 6-2 6-4 Pam Casale Match data
Apr 7, 1982* Hilton Head WTA 250 R64 Clay Pam Casale 6-7 6-4 6-4 Billie Jean King Match data
Jan 15, 1982* Cincinnati WTA 1000 R16 Carpet Billie Jean King 7-5 6-4 Pam Casale Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Billie Jean King #22 #13 — 2,402 684 160 81.0% 9 1 0 3 59 72
Pam Casale #671 #14 22 1,944 168 147 53.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Billie Jean King Pam Casale
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1980 15–10 60.0% — 1,597 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1981 30–17 63.8% — 1,811 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1982 20–23 46.5% — 1,746 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1983 23–20 53.5% — 1,769 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1984 31–17 64.6% #15 1,914 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1985 24–20 54.5% #14 1,814 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1986 16–17 48.5% #41 1,787 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 1987 5–11 31.2% #111 1,654 0 0
24 1968 40–5 88.9% — 1,823 2 6 1988 4–10 28.6% #169 1,542 0 0
25 1969 58–14 80.6% — 2,043 2 11 1989 0–1 0.0% #225 1,537 0 0
26 1970 47–11 81.0% — 2,172 2 16 1990 0–1 0.0% #554 1,516 0 0
27 1971 114–15 88.4% — 2,293 3 33 — — — — — — —
28 1972 89–15 85.6% — 2,341 6 43 — — — — — — —
29 1973 56–12 82.4% — 2,294 7 50 — — — — — — —
30 1974 54–8 87.1% — 2,300 8 56 — — — — — — —
31 1975 23–3 88.5% — 2,370 9 58 — — — — — — —
32 1976 2–2 50.0% — 2,316 9 58 — — — — — — —
33 1977 46–6 88.5% — 2,386 9 64 — — — — — — —
34 1978 28–12 70.0% — 2,301 9 64 — — — — — — —
35 1979 36–13 73.5% — 2,164 9 66 — — — — — — —
36 1980 39–15 72.2% — 2,122 9 69 — — — — — — —
37 1981 4–5 44.4% — 2,019 9 69 — — — — — — —
38 1982 26–19 57.8% — 1,932 9 70 — — — — — — —
39 1983 22–5 81.5% — 2,052 9 72 — — — — — — —