H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Billie Jean King vs Pam Shriver H2H: 4-0

Billie Jean King holds a 4–0 lead over Pam Shriver in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Billie Jean King leads 2–0 on carpet and 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Billie Jean King won the 1982 Boston third round 6-7 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Billie Jean King
Age 82 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 18, 1982* Boston WTA 250 R32 Carpet Billie Jean King 6-7 6-2 6-4 Pam Shriver Match data
Jul 2, 1980* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Billie Jean King 5-7 7-6 10-8 Pam Shriver Match data
Jan 11, 1980* Cincinnati WTA 1000 R16 Carpet Billie Jean King 7-5 2-6 6-4 Pam Shriver Match data
Nov 30, 1979* Melbourne WTA 250 R16 Grass Billie Jean King 6-4 2-6 6-2 Pam Shriver Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Billie Jean King #22 #13 — 2,402 684 160 81.0% 9 1 0 3 59 72
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,302 624 277 69.3% 0 0 0 4 20 24

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Billie Jean King Pam Shriver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,849 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,798 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 1980 47–21 69.1% — 2,027 0 2
18 — — — — — — — 1981 58–25 69.9% — 2,122 0 4
19 — — — — — — — 1982 47–19 71.2% — 2,087 0 5
20 — — — — — — — 1983 52–15 77.6% — 2,161 0 8
21 — — — — — — — 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10
22 — — — — — — — 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,117 0 14
23 — — — — — — — 1986 47–15 75.8% #5 2,194 0 16
24 1968 40–5 88.9% — 1,823 2 6 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,254 0 20
25 1969 58–14 80.6% — 2,043 2 11 1988 58–14 80.6% #5 2,188 0 24
26 1970 47–11 81.0% — 2,172 2 16 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,955 0 24
27 1971 114–15 88.4% — 2,293 3 33 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,911 0 24
28 1972 89–15 85.6% — 2,341 6 43 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,822 0 24
29 1973 56–12 82.4% — 2,294 7 50 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,858 0 24
30 1974 54–8 87.1% — 2,300 8 56 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24
31 1975 23–3 88.5% — 2,370 9 58 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24
32 1976 2–2 50.0% — 2,316 9 58 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24
33 1977 46–6 88.5% — 2,386 9 64 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24
34 1978 28–12 70.0% — 2,301 9 64 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24
35 1979 36–13 73.5% — 2,164 9 66 — — — — — — —
36 1980 39–15 72.2% — 2,122 9 69 — — — — — — —
37 1981 4–5 44.4% — 2,019 9 69 — — — — — — —
38 1982 26–19 57.8% — 1,932 9 70 — — — — — — —
39 1983 22–5 81.5% — 2,052 9 72 — — — — — — —