H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic vs Jelena Dokic H2H: 1-1
Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic and Jelena Dokic are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic won the 2011 Toronto second round 2-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SRB
Age 34
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2011 | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic | 2-0 (ret.) | Jelena Dokic | Match data |
| Mar 5, 2011* | Kuala Lumpur | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Jelena Dokic | 7-6(4) 6-2 | Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic | #546 | #32 | 1,485 | 1,737 | 97 | 125 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Jelena Dokic | #945 | #4 | 3,338 | 2,031 | 208 | 175 | 54.3% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic | Jelena Dokic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #43 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,769 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2010 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #80 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #8 | 1,999 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 2011 | 14–26 | 35.0% | #73 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 53–27 | 66.2% | #9 | 1,897 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 2012 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #56 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 28–30 | 48.3% | #15 | 1,778 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 2013 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #124 | 1,582 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 2014 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #57 | 1,615 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #349 | 1,525 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2015 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #79 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #587 | 1,499 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2016 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #725 | 1,558 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #179 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #546 | 1,518 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #56 | 1,527 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #138 | 1,513 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #258 | 1,516 | 0 | 6 |