H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic vs Lourdes Domínguez Lino H2H: 0-1

Lourdes Domínguez Lino holds a 1–0 lead over Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lourdes Domínguez Lino leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lourdes Domínguez Lino won the 2012 Miami Open round of 128 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic
SRB Age 34 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Spain Age 45 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lourdes Domínguez Lino #100 6-3 6-3 Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic #106 Match data Mar 20, 2012* R128 Miami Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic #546 #32 1,485 1,735 97 125 43.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Lourdes Domínguez Lino #1,129 #40 1,305 1,673 125 157 44.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic Lourdes Domínguez Lino
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2010 6–12 33.3% #80 1,530 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2011 14–26 35.0% #73 1,547 0 0 2000 0–1 0.0% #141 1,489 0 0
20 2012 17–17 50.0% #56 1,617 0 1 2001 0–1 0.0% #378 1,479 0 0
21 2013 23–18 56.1% #36 1,725 0 2 2002 4–3 57.1% #390 1,518 0 0
22 2014 20–26 43.5% #57 1,614 0 2 2003 0–1 0.0% #319 1,503 0 0
23 2015 17–21 44.7% #79 1,619 0 2 2004 1–1 50.0% #208 1,508 0 0
24 2016 0–4 0.0% #725 1,555 0 2 2005 6–4 60.0% #72 1,553 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2006 21–19 52.5% #52 1,623 0 1
26 2018 0–1 0.0% #546 1,517 0 2 2007 16–21 43.2% #71 1,557 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 2008 6–11 35.3% #91 1,507 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 2009 6–13 31.6% #134 1,477 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2010 2–4 33.3% #85 1,487 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2011 16–16 50.0% #79 1,574 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2012 16–16 50.0% #48 1,652 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2013 17–22 43.6% #69 1,620 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2014 7–11 38.9% #110 1,568 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2015 4–5 44.4% #100 1,550 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2016 3–8 27.3% #220 1,516 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2010 4 8 12 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2011 11 19 30 36.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2012 15 13 28 53.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2001 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2013 17 11 28 60.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2002 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — —
22 2014 16 16 32 50.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2015 13 14 27 48.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2004 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2016 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 7 10 17 41.2% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2018 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 3 9 12 25.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 4 4 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 3 4 25.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 3 6 9 33.3% 11 8 19 57.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 10 8 18 55.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1 8 9 11.1% 16 11 27 59.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 0 5 5 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 0 3 3 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
Career — 76 85 161 47.2% 12 24 36 33.3% 9 15 24 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — 27 59 86 31.4% 94 88 182 51.6% 4 9 13 30.8% 0 1 1 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2010 1531 114.5 -2.51 -1.59 0.841 46.2% +13 -17 — 32.5% -1.22 3–1 (75%) — — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2011 1547 128.9 -1.89 -0.36 0.921 48.2% +6 -18 +15 37.1% -1.03 4–7 (36%) 4–7 (36%) 97.3 -1.36 2000 1489 98.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.06
20 2012 1618 120.6 -2.69 +0.80 0.946 48.6% +12 -75 -38 45.3% -0.29 7–4 (64%) 2–4 (33%) 103.0 +0.73 2001 1480 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.06
21 2013 1726 131.6 +0.33 +0.31 0.998 50.1% +11 -145 -164 55.2% +0.22 7–7 (50%) 7–2 (78%) 102.6 -0.10 2002 1519 112.4 — — — — — +41 — 57.1% +0.14 — 2–1 (67%) — +0.22
22 2014 1614 113.7 -1.74 -2.06 0.905 47.9% +21 -83 -23 40.0% -0.72 14–4 (78%) 2–6 (25%) 105.8 +0.57 2003 1503 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.07
23 2015 1620 111.9 -3.72 +0.36 0.900 47.8% +1 -82 -66 39.1% -0.66 11–2 (85%) 3–7 (30%) 107.3 -0.12 2004 1509 105.8 — — — — — — — 50.0% +1.34 1–1 0–1 — +0.01
24 2016 1555 84.5 -4.79 -2.24 0.516 35.1% -2 — — 0.0% -4.88 — — — -0.31 2005 1553 117.7 — — — — — +72 — 61.9% +0.38 0–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.23
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1623 121.0 — — — — -68 +93 — 51.2% -0.30 4–4 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 102.8 +0.22
26 2018 1518 94.6 +0.08 -0.64 0.624 40.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.07 2007 1558 113.3 — — — — -56 +110 — 43.2% -0.49 4–3 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 100.6 -0.29
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1508 107.1 — — — — -48 +107 — 37.8% -1.11 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — -0.03
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1477 108.0 — — — — -35 +83 — 37.8% -0.82 2–5 (29%) 2–5 (29%) 95.2 +0.87
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1487 102.6 — — — — 0 — — 35.7% -1.36 1–1 0–1 — +0.13
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1575 121.5 — — — — -73 0 +20 50.0% +0.11 6–6 (50%) 1–7 (13%) 95.2 +0.42
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1653 124.6 — — — — -17 -96 — 54.3% +0.04 2–6 (25%) 4–1 (80%) 100.6 0.00
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1620 121.2 — — — — -86 +113 — 41.3% -0.81 10–8 (56%) 2–3 (40%) 103.9 -1.33
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1569 107.5 — — — — -102 +137 — 40.0% -0.89 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.57
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1550 113.7 -1.03 +0.35 0.984 50.1% — +126 — 50.0% -0.05 1–3 (25%) 2–0 — +0.51
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1517 97.5 -3.20 -2.29 0.761 44.1% -86 +117 — 25.0% -1.75 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — -0.18
Career — 1736 122.2 -1.90 -0.49 0.912 48.0% +11 -76 -64 41.6% -0.64 46–25 (65%) 18–26 (41%) 107.3 -0.32 — 1674 120.0 -2.29 -1.18 0.851 46.6% -55 +78 +20 45.2% -0.48 35–45 (44%) 26–29 (47%) 98.8 +0.46

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.