H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Brenda Catton vs Julie Harrington H2H: 1-0

Brenda Catton holds a 1–0 lead over Julie Harrington in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Brenda Catton leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Brenda Catton won the 1980 Beckenham round of 64 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Brenda Catton
AUS Age 64
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Julie Harrington
USA Age 64

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Brenda Catton 6-2 7-5 Julie Harrington Match data Jun 4, 1980* R64 Beckenham WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Brenda Catton — — — 1,519 9 17 34.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Julie Harrington #175 #70 — 1,741 55 80 40.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Brenda Catton Julie Harrington
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1979 0–2 0.0% — 1,468 0 0 1979 3–6 33.3% — 1,523 0 0
18 1980 6–12 33.3% — 1,484 0 0 1980 12–17 41.4% — 1,602 0 0
19 1981 3–3 50.0% — 1,499 0 0 1981 18–15 54.5% — 1,724 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1982 6–19 24.0% — 1,589 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1983 15–16 48.4% — 1,629 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1984 1–7 12.5% #175 1,571 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Brenda Catton Julie Harrington
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1979 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1979 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
18 1980 — — — — 1 6 7 14.3% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 1980 4 6 10 40.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1981 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1981 9 5 14 64.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 7 7 14 50.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1 6 7 14.3% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 1 7 8 12.5%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 11 8 19 57.9% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
Career — — — — — 3 7 10 30.0% 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — — 28 31 59 47.5% 12 20 32 37.5% 0 5 5 0.0% 11 22 33 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Brenda Catton Julie Harrington
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1979 1469 95.5 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — +0.50 1979 1524 114.6 — — — — +97 — — 42.9% -0.76 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — +0.68
18 1980 1484 105.5 — — — — — -50 +62 38.5% -0.62 2–3 (40%) 1–0 — +0.73 1980 1602 125.8 — — — — -16 -20 -127 42.9% -0.17 2–5 (29%) 2–6 (25%) 94.7 -1.23
19 1981 1499 107.8 — — — — — +1 — 50.0% +0.50 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.78 1981 1725 127.6 — — — — +24 -106 — 48.1% -0.03 10–3 (77%) 3–4 (43%) 108.5 +2.87
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1589 116.4 — — — — -34 +6 — 31.1% -1.28 4–7 (36%) 1–2 (33%) 96.7 -0.86
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1629 115.5 — — — — +33 -32 — 48.6% -0.35 5–5 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 103.6 +2.39
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1571 105.9 — — — — +13 — — 22.2% -1.83 0–2 3–1 (75%) — -0.33
Career — 1520 104.9 — — — — — -35 +62 40.0% -0.49 4–6 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 99.6 +8.04 — 1741 124.4 — — — — +18 -28 -127 42.0% -0.53 21–25 (46%) 14–16 (47%) 101.0 +2.61

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.