H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy vs Helena Sukova H2H: 1-3
Helena Sukova holds a 3–1 lead over Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Helena Sukova leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy won the 1997 Eastbourne third round 6-3 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 55
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 61
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 1997* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | 6-3 7-6 | Helena Sukova | Match data |
| Jun 18, 1993* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Helena Sukova | 7-5 6-2 | Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | Match data |
| Mar 10, 1989* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Helena Sukova | 6-3 6-4 | Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | Match data |
| Jan 8, 1989* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | F | Hard | Helena Sukova | 7-6 7-6 | Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | #919 | #9 | 1,672 | 2,025 | 295 | 220 | 57.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Helena Sukova | #102 | #4 | 735 | 2,217 | 580 | 297 | 66.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | Helena Sukova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1987 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #149 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1988 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #40 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 23–23 | 50.0% | — | 1,757 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #83 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 33–20 | 62.3% | — | 1,907 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #43 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 48–23 | 67.6% | #7 | 2,041 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1991 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #30 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 54–21 | 72.0% | #9 | 2,028 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1992 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #33 | 1,818 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 69–21 | 76.7% | #6 | 2,151 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1993 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #40 | 1,789 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 58–19 | 75.3% | #7 | 2,129 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1994 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #15 | 1,885 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 49–19 | 72.1% | #8 | 2,120 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1995 | 37–15 | 71.2% | #13 | 1,970 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 39–15 | 72.2% | #8 | 2,043 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 1996 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #12 | 1,908 | 0 | 6 | 1990 | 41–17 | 70.7% | #14 | 2,025 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1997 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #15 | 1,855 | 0 | 7 | 1991 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #17 | 1,958 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 1998 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #188 | 1,673 | 0 | 7 | 1992 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #12 | 1,976 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #893 | 1,651 | 0 | 7 | 1993 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #17 | 1,925 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,889 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 9 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #35 | 1,792 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #80 | 1,661 | 0 | 9 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #102 | 1,637 | 0 | 9 |
| 35 | 2006 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #299 | 1,642 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #190 | 1,614 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #391 | 1,592 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |