H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy vs Sandra Cecchini H2H: 5-1

Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy holds a 5–1 lead over Sandra Cecchini in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy leads 5–1 on clay. Most recently, Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy won the 1994 Palermo semifinal 7-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
NED Age 55 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main draw meetings
Sandra Cecchini
ITA Age 61 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 10, 1994* Palermo WTA 250 SF Clay Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #27 7-6 6-4 Sandra Cecchini #52 Match data
May 11, 1994* Berlin WTA 1000 R64 Clay Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #28 6-4 6-3 Sandra Cecchini #53 Match data
May 2, 1993* Taranto WTA 250 QF Clay Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #40 6-4 7-5 Sandra Cecchini #31 Match data
Apr 11, 1991* Amelia Island WTA 250 R32 Clay Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #87 6-3 6-0 Sandra Cecchini #23 Match data
May 29, 1988* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #49 6-4 7-5 Sandra Cecchini #19 Match data
Jul 10, 1987* Bastad WTA 250 R16 Clay Sandra Cecchini #42 6-2 6-4 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #243 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #919 #9 1,672 2,025 295 220 57.3% 0 0 0 0 7 7
Sandra Cecchini #487 #15 279 1,937 299 215 58.2% 0 0 0 3 8 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy Sandra Cecchini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,490 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1987 5–6 45.5% #149 1,515 0 0 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 1988 21–18 53.8% #40 1,689 0 0 1982 2–2 50.0% — 1,485 0 0
18 1989 15–22 40.5% #83 1,603 0 0 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,497 0 0
19 1990 18–17 51.4% #43 1,677 0 0 1984 17–15 53.1% #49 1,651 0 1
20 1991 24–19 55.8% #30 1,799 0 1 1985 22–19 53.7% #49 1,746 0 2
21 1992 30–20 60.0% #33 1,818 0 2 1986 15–19 44.1% #73 1,635 0 3
22 1993 26–20 56.5% #40 1,789 0 3 1987 36–16 69.2% #18 1,860 0 5
23 1994 44–21 67.7% #15 1,885 0 3 1988 34–14 70.8% #21 1,845 0 7
24 1995 37–15 71.2% #13 1,970 0 5 1989 28–15 65.1% #26 1,798 0 8
25 1996 35–18 66.0% #12 1,908 0 6 1990 26–14 65.0% #20 1,815 0 9
26 1997 34–25 57.6% #15 1,855 0 7 1991 22–13 62.9% #27 1,776 0 10
27 1998 3–10 23.1% #188 1,673 0 7 1992 23–15 60.5% #34 1,824 0 11
28 1999 0–1 0.0% #893 1,651 0 7 1993 18–15 54.5% #56 1,725 0 11
29 — — — — — — — 1994 28–16 63.6% #33 1,840 0 11
30 — — — — — — — 1995 9–14 39.1% #108 1,661 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 1996 10–10 50.0% #80 1,629 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1997 4–7 36.4% #206 1,610 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1998 4–8 33.3% #200 1,556 0 11
35 2006 2–3 40.0% #299 1,642 0 7 — — — — — — —
36 2007 1–3 25.0% #190 1,614 0 7 — — — — — — —
37 2008 0–1 0.0% #391 1,592 0 7 — — — — — — —