H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Camila Giorgi vs Bethanie Mattek-Sands

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Camila Giorgi vs Bethanie Mattek-Sands.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Camila Giorgi
Italy Age 34 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main-draw meetings
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
United States Age 41 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Camila Giorgi #77 6-3 6-1 Bethanie Mattek-Sands #106 Match data Jul 24, 2016 Q2 Q Canadian Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Camila Giorgi #116 #26 1,978 1,899 211 188 52.9% 0 1 0 0 3 4
Bethanie Mattek-Sands #1,356 #30 1,643 1,779 132 171 43.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Camila Giorgi Bethanie Mattek-Sands
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2001 0–2 0.0% #343 1,471 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #214 1,470 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2003 0–5 0.0% #158 1,428 0 0
19 2011 0–1 0.0% #151 1,486 0 0 2004 2–3 40.0% #172 1,445 0 0
20 2012 6–10 37.5% #75 1,523 0 0 2005 3–3 50.0% #123 1,488 0 0
21 2013 8–11 42.1% #98 1,578 0 0 2006 9–12 42.9% #126 1,571 0 0
22 2014 27–19 58.7% #34 1,709 0 0 2007 6–8 42.9% #114 1,590 0 0
23 2015 26–21 55.3% #35 1,727 0 1 2008 19–14 57.6% #39 1,700 0 0
24 2016 16–20 44.4% #82 1,645 0 1 2009 7–14 33.3% #153 1,624 0 0
25 2017 15–13 53.6% #78 1,759 0 1 2010 14–13 51.9% #58 1,706 0 0
26 2018 29–16 64.4% #26 1,866 0 2 2011 18–14 56.2% #55 1,709 0 0
27 2019 13–15 46.4% #100 1,749 0 2 2012 5–9 35.7% #169 1,667 0 0
28 2020 10–9 52.6% #76 1,736 0 2 2013 16–15 51.6% #48 1,691 0 0
29 2021 24–17 58.5% #33 1,829 0 3 2014 3–9 25.0% #177 1,611 0 0
30 2022 14–16 46.7% #66 1,769 0 3 2015 14–14 50.0% #60 1,680 0 0
31 2023 20–15 57.1% #53 1,790 0 4 2016 5–15 25.0% #178 1,579 0 0
32 2024 3–5 37.5% #116 1,762 0 4 2017 7–7 50.0% #123 1,672 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2018 1–6 14.3% #350 1,607 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2019 1–3 25.0% #370 1,588 0 0
35 — — — — — — — 2020 0–1 0.0% #338 1,609 0 0
36 — — — — — — — 2021 2–2 50.0% #368 1,599 0 0
38 — — — — — — — 2023 0–1 0.0% #1360 1,546 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Camila Giorgi Bethanie Mattek-Sands
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2011 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2004 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2012 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2005 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2013 4 5 9 44.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2006 5 4 9 55.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
22 2014 17 11 28 60.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2007 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2015 17 15 32 53.1% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 2008 10 7 17 58.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
24 2016 12 13 25 48.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2009 4 6 10 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 2017 7 7 14 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2010 9 7 16 56.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
26 2018 15 9 24 62.5% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2011 8 7 15 53.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
27 2019 13 13 26 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2012 3 7 10 30.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
28 2020 6 5 11 54.5% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 8 10 18 44.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2021 16 10 26 61.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2014 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2022 5 8 13 38.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 2015 8 7 15 53.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
31 2023 13 8 21 61.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2016 3 10 13 23.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 2024 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 3 4 7 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 131 117 248 52.8% 38 40 78 48.7% 42 31 73 57.5% — — — — — 77 105 182 42.3% 38 48 86 44.2% 13 15 28 46.4% 4 3 7 57.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 366/400 of Camila Giorgi's and 249/290 of Bethanie Mattek-Sands's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Camila Giorgi Bethanie Mattek-Sands
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 1/5 1.0 3.0 54.7% 56.1% 35.3% 20.0% 61.5% 46.7% 49.4%
19 2011 1/1 3.0 7.0 53.3% 66.7% 28.6% 33.3% 0.0% 48.9% 26.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2012 16/16 1.7 7.4 53.8% 66.1% 42.4% 53.5% 42.4% 55.1% 43.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2013 16/19 2.0 7.7 56.3% 63.1% 45.2% 50.3% 46.6% 54.9% 42.7% 2006 13/21 3.3 2.6 58.5% 64.2% 43.2% 51.7% 42.0% 55.3% 42.2%
22 2014 44/46 3.2 8.2 53.9% 70.1% 49.0% 53.4% 44.4% 60.3% 43.8% 2007 13/14 2.2 1.5 57.7% 66.3% 49.3% 46.9% 43.7% 58.9% 41.2%
23 2015 36/47 3.1 10.5 60.2% 68.8% 54.7% 56.5% 54.2% 63.0% 41.9% 2008 23/33 1.6 3.7 64.3% 62.9% 46.1% 64.0% 47.4% 56.9% 45.5%
24 2016 32/37 2.0 6.9 56.7% 62.8% 45.8% 51.5% 46.0% 55.4% 42.1% 2009 20/21 1.7 2.4 63.3% 57.7% 45.5% 46.1% 46.9% 52.9% 41.6%
25 2017 27/28 2.9 6.5 56.0% 64.5% 47.9% 50.1% 45.3% 57.4% 42.1% 2010 26/27 2.2 2.0 61.3% 64.4% 51.1% 59.0% 47.7% 59.3% 45.0%
26 2018 43/45 3.5 5.0 59.2% 67.0% 49.8% 51.2% 49.9% 60.1% 44.6% 2011 30/32 1.8 2.9 58.9% 62.7% 47.4% 46.8% 49.5% 56.3% 46.5%
27 2019 25/28 2.7 6.0 55.8% 62.6% 46.0% 48.7% 52.2% 55.2% 44.3% 2012 13/14 3.1 2.8 51.1% 68.5% 44.4% 54.8% 52.0% 56.7% 40.9%
28 2020 19/19 2.7 6.7 56.5% 64.6% 47.6% 49.2% 45.0% 57.4% 41.2% 2013 27/31 2.4 3.0 54.9% 68.8% 47.6% 53.9% 48.4% 58.9% 43.9%
29 2021 34/41 3.5 6.8 54.2% 67.0% 48.5% 46.3% 49.1% 58.5% 44.1% 2014 12/12 2.4 3.1 58.1% 60.2% 43.1% 50.7% 45.1% 53.1% 43.9%
30 2022 30/30 2.4 7.3 54.3% 66.8% 44.8% 45.9% 48.2% 56.7% 43.5% 2015 21/28 1.7 3.3 61.5% 63.6% 51.1% 55.5% 52.4% 58.9% 41.4%
31 2023 35/35 3.0 6.3 56.0% 67.8% 45.8% 56.8% 46.0% 58.2% 45.1% 2016 20/21 2.2 4.2 56.6% 62.3% 45.1% 47.9% 43.6% 54.9% 41.5%
32 2024 8/8 3.8 7.0 54.0% 68.3% 42.3% 64.2% 47.5% 56.5% 37.4% 2017 13/14 1.8 2.9 55.0% 61.5% 45.4% 57.9% 49.2% 53.6% 45.2%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 7/7 1.9 3.1 55.8% 61.6% 47.2% 57.8% 36.8% 54.9% 36.7%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 4/4 1.0 1.0 59.9% 59.5% 37.2% 43.1% 30.6% 50.5% 37.4%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 1/1 0.0 2.0 68.9% 52.4% 42.1% 50.0% 50.0% 49.2% 38.2%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 4/4 4.8 2.0 63.2% 64.2% 49.7% 62.7% 52.8% 58.9% 38.5%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 1/1 1.0 2.0 58.7% 40.7% 21.1% 22.2% 75.0% 32.6% 46.3%
Career — 366/400 2.9 7.1 56.2% 66.5% 47.7% 51.6% 47.6% 58.2% 43.2% — 249/304 2.1 2.8 58.9% 63.4% 46.8% 53.0% 47.3% 56.3% 43.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Camila Giorgi Bethanie Mattek-Sands
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1472 97.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–2 — — +0.24
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1471 102.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — -0.24
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1428 97.9 -0.28 +0.13 0.926 48.1% +37 — — 23.1% -2.08 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — -0.11
19 2011 1486 95.9 -1.46 -1.61 0.519 37.2% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.13 2004 1446 108.5 — — — — +27 — — 41.7% -0.09 1–1 0–3 (0%) — +0.26
20 2012 1524 109.2 -0.06 -0.52 0.966 49.3% -40 — +152 37.5% -0.78 0–2 1–1 — +0.04 2005 1489 107.8 — — — — +15 — — 33.3% -1.42 2–0 1–0 — -0.17
21 2013 1578 118.6 -0.28 -0.45 0.945 49.0% -55 -44 +82 45.2% -0.64 1–3 (25%) 4–1 (80%) 101.6 -0.04 2006 1572 122.2 +0.43 -1.68 0.943 48.6% +8 -91 +26 43.1% -0.39 5–4 (56%) 0–3 (0%) 100.0 -0.91
22 2014 1710 139.3 +3.53 +0.42 1.105 51.9% -5 -132 +5 57.3% +0.60 9–11 (45%) 9–9 (50%) 101.9 +0.57 2007 1591 123.2 +1.17 -0.38 1.004 49.7% +13 — +9 40.7% -0.26 0–1 0–2 — -0.75
23 2015 1728 132.8 +4.03 +0.45 1.135 52.6% -8 -203 +75 51.9% +0.18 10–8 (56%) 6–5 (55%) 99.6 -0.69 2008 1701 126.2 +0.68 +1.30 1.057 51.4% -35 -233 +73 57.1% +0.42 5–6 (45%) 6–6 (50%) 100.5 +1.78
24 2016 1645 130.4 -0.24 -0.73 0.944 49.0% +10 -57 +63 44.9% -0.37 5–5 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 102.1 -2.53 2009 1625 117.3 -1.61 -0.51 0.884 47.3% +19 -138 — 36.2% -1.00 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) 100.2 -1.14
25 2017 1760 124.4 +1.05 -0.11 0.987 50.1% -52 -146 +35 49.3% +0.18 10–3 (77%) 5–7 (42%) 106.2 -1.25 2010 1706 132.3 +2.85 +1.63 1.105 52.1% -12 -173 -19 53.8% +0.32 4–7 (36%) 1–4 (20%) 95.8 -1.05
26 2018 1866 142.2 +3.05 +1.65 1.117 52.4% -27 -140 -22 61.6% +0.82 6–5 (55%) 4–1 (80%) 104.5 -0.86 2011 1710 132.8 +1.02 +2.01 1.066 51.4% -2 -69 — 53.9% +0.33 7–7 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 101.1 -0.55
27 2019 1750 138.4 -0.54 +0.95 0.989 49.8% +3 — — 50.8% +0.24 3–6 (33%) 4–2 (67%) 95.3 -0.70 2012 1667 120.6 +0.55 -1.32 0.945 48.5% -24 — — 43.8% -0.37 0–4 (0%) 2–0 — -1.24
28 2020 1737 130.8 +0.83 -1.43 0.968 49.3% +18 -34 — 53.2% -0.11 6–5 (55%) 6–0 (100%) 104.5 -0.95 2013 1691 135.2 +2.51 +1.00 1.067 51.5% -81 +69 — 52.1% +0.58 6–5 (55%) 2–3 (40%) 100.2 -0.57
29 2021 1829 139.7 +1.63 +1.37 1.062 51.2% -14 -167 +30 57.8% +0.65 8–4 (67%) 5–4 (56%) 103.6 -1.02 2014 1611 124.9 -0.22 +1.80 0.936 48.9% -60 — — 38.5% -0.69 0–4 (0%) 0–1 — -0.42
30 2022 1770 135.5 +0.11 +1.41 1.004 50.0% 0 -96 +100 52.1% +0.13 4–9 (31%) 3–5 (38%) 93.9 +0.10 2015 1680 127.9 +0.59 +0.51 1.006 50.5% -53 -16 -8 50.7% +0.25 5–6 (45%) 3–4 (43%) 98.7 +0.68
31 2023 1791 142.9 +1.46 +1.59 1.078 51.6% +17 -99 +67 59.7% +0.61 3–5 (38%) 6–4 (60%) 99.9 -1.28 2016 1580 121.1 -1.28 -1.16 0.918 48.2% -19 +56 — 37.7% -0.77 3–10 (23%) 4–2 (67%) 96.4 -1.05
32 2024 1762 129.7 +0.86 -0.25 0.860 47.5% +11 — — 42.1% -0.68 1–2 (33%) — — -1.16 2017 1673 126.6 -1.67 +2.39 0.975 49.6% -21 +4 — 50.0% -0.17 3–1 (75%) 2–0 — -0.16
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1608 112.8 0.00 -2.91 0.814 46.1% +12 +23 — 25.0% -1.44 0–2 0–3 (0%) — -0.29
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1589 112.7 -1.45 -1.61 0.756 43.6% -1 — — 30.0% -1.50 1–1 0–1 — -0.11
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1609 112.8 -0.17 +0.01 0.752 43.4% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.19
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1599 112.0 +0.16 -1.07 0.936 50.3% +10 — — 44.4% +0.22 1–0 1–1 — +0.19
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1587 101.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1546 101.7 -1.87 -2.19 0.688 39.1% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.04
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1533 97.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1531 101.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1900 141.2 +1.54 +0.55 1.033 50.7% -8 -112 +54 52.9% +0.22 66–68 (49%) 56–41 (58%) 104.4 -2.43 — 1779 132.2 +0.56 +0.45 0.989 49.8% -20 -58 +32 46.0% -0.19 45–67 (40%) 30–41 (42%) 92.4 -1.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.