H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Camila Giorgi vs Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic H2H: 1-0

Camila Giorgi holds a 1–0 lead over Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Camila Giorgi leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Camila Giorgi won the 2014 Roland Garros round of 128 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Camila Giorgi
Italy Age 34 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic
SRB Age 34 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Camila Giorgi #50 6-4 6-3 Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic #37 Match data May 28, 2014* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Camila Giorgi #116 #26 1,978 1,899 211 188 52.9% 0 1 0 0 3 4
Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic #546 #32 1,485 1,735 97 125 43.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Camila Giorgi Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2010 6–12 33.3% #80 1,530 0 0
19 2011 0–1 0.0% #151 1,486 0 0 2011 14–26 35.0% #73 1,547 0 0
20 2012 6–10 37.5% #75 1,523 0 0 2012 17–17 50.0% #56 1,617 0 1
21 2013 8–11 42.1% #98 1,578 0 0 2013 23–18 56.1% #36 1,725 0 2
22 2014 27–19 58.7% #34 1,709 0 0 2014 20–26 43.5% #57 1,614 0 2
23 2015 26–21 55.3% #35 1,727 0 1 2015 17–21 44.7% #79 1,619 0 2
24 2016 16–20 44.4% #82 1,645 0 1 2016 0–4 0.0% #725 1,555 0 2
25 2017 15–13 53.6% #78 1,759 0 1 — — — — — — —
26 2018 29–16 64.4% #26 1,866 0 2 2018 0–1 0.0% #546 1,517 0 2
27 2019 13–15 46.4% #100 1,749 0 2 — — — — — — —
28 2020 10–9 52.6% #76 1,736 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 2021 24–17 58.5% #33 1,829 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 2022 14–16 46.7% #66 1,769 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 2023 20–15 57.1% #53 1,790 0 4 — — — — — — —
32 2024 3–5 37.5% #116 1,762 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Camila Giorgi Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 4 8 12 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
19 2011 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2011 11 19 30 36.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
20 2012 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2012 15 13 28 53.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
21 2013 4 5 9 44.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2013 17 11 28 60.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
22 2014 17 11 28 60.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2014 16 16 32 50.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2015 17 15 32 53.1% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 2015 13 14 27 48.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
24 2016 12 13 25 48.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2016 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2017 7 7 14 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2018 15 9 24 62.5% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2018 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2019 13 13 26 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2020 6 5 11 54.5% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2021 16 10 26 61.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2022 5 8 13 38.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2023 13 8 21 61.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2024 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 131 117 248 52.8% 38 40 78 48.7% 42 31 73 57.5% — — — — — 76 85 161 47.2% 12 24 36 33.3% 9 15 24 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 366/400 of Camila Giorgi's and 199/222 of Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Camila Giorgi Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 17/18 1.3 2.6 65.7% 56.8% 37.9% 47.3% 48.4% 50.8% 41.4%
19 2011 1/1 3.0 7.0 53.3% 66.7% 28.6% 33.3% 0.0% 48.9% 26.5% 2011 39/40 1.8 3.2 65.6% 58.8% 42.3% 49.4% 43.9% 53.2% 43.1%
20 2012 16/16 1.7 7.4 53.8% 66.1% 42.4% 53.5% 42.4% 55.1% 43.4% 2012 31/34 1.7 4.1 64.2% 58.4% 41.2% 46.6% 51.7% 52.1% 45.3%
21 2013 16/19 2.0 7.7 56.3% 63.1% 45.2% 50.3% 46.6% 54.9% 42.7% 2013 37/41 1.5 4.6 63.1% 62.1% 45.1% 51.8% 54.8% 55.9% 44.0%
22 2014 44/46 3.2 8.2 53.9% 70.1% 49.0% 53.4% 44.4% 60.3% 43.8% 2014 45/46 2.3 4.6 60.9% 62.5% 41.5% 46.4% 38.7% 54.1% 41.5%
23 2015 36/47 3.1 10.5 60.2% 68.8% 54.7% 56.5% 54.2% 63.0% 41.9% 2015 25/38 1.8 4.0 64.7% 59.1% 43.8% 47.5% 51.8% 53.4% 41.9%
24 2016 32/37 2.0 6.9 56.7% 62.8% 45.8% 51.5% 46.0% 55.4% 42.1% 2016 4/4 1.0 2.5 61.2% 44.4% 24.4% 33.9% 16.7% 36.6% 32.7%
25 2017 27/28 2.9 6.5 56.0% 64.5% 47.9% 50.1% 45.3% 57.4% 42.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2018 43/45 3.5 5.0 59.2% 67.0% 49.8% 51.2% 49.9% 60.1% 44.6% 2018 1/1 3.0 4.0 63.2% 48.8% 36.0% 33.3% 66.7% 44.1% 34.9%
27 2019 25/28 2.7 6.0 55.8% 62.6% 46.0% 48.7% 52.2% 55.2% 44.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2020 19/19 2.7 6.7 56.5% 64.6% 47.6% 49.2% 45.0% 57.4% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2021 34/41 3.5 6.8 54.2% 67.0% 48.5% 46.3% 49.1% 58.5% 44.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2022 30/30 2.4 7.3 54.3% 66.8% 44.8% 45.9% 48.2% 56.7% 43.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2023 35/35 3.0 6.3 56.0% 67.8% 45.8% 56.8% 46.0% 58.2% 45.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2024 8/8 3.8 7.0 54.0% 68.3% 42.3% 64.2% 47.5% 56.5% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 366/400 2.9 7.1 56.2% 66.5% 47.7% 51.6% 47.6% 58.2% 43.2% — 199/222 1.8 4.0 63.7% 59.7% 41.9% 47.9% 46.9% 53.2% 42.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Camila Giorgi Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1531 114.5 -2.51 -1.59 0.841 46.2% +13 -17 — 32.5% -1.22 3–1 (75%) — — -0.04
19 2011 1486 95.9 -1.46 -1.61 0.519 37.2% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.13 2011 1547 128.9 -1.89 -0.36 0.921 48.2% +6 -18 +15 37.1% -1.03 4–7 (36%) 4–7 (36%) — -1.36
20 2012 1524 109.2 -0.06 -0.52 0.966 49.3% -40 — +152 37.5% -0.78 0–2 1–1 — +0.04 2012 1618 120.6 -2.69 +0.80 0.946 48.6% +12 -75 -38 45.3% -0.29 7–4 (64%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.73
21 2013 1578 118.6 -0.28 -0.45 0.945 49.0% -55 -44 +82 45.2% -0.64 1–3 (25%) 4–1 (80%) — -0.04 2013 1726 131.6 +0.33 +0.31 0.998 50.1% +11 -145 -164 55.2% +0.22 7–7 (50%) 7–2 (78%) — -0.10
22 2014 1710 139.3 +3.53 +0.42 1.105 51.9% -5 -132 +5 57.3% +0.60 9–11 (45%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.57 2014 1614 113.7 -1.74 -2.06 0.905 47.9% +21 -83 -23 40.0% -0.72 14–4 (78%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.57
23 2015 1728 132.8 +4.03 +0.45 1.135 52.6% -8 -203 +75 51.9% +0.18 10–8 (56%) 6–5 (55%) — -0.69 2015 1620 111.9 -3.72 +0.36 0.900 47.8% +1 -82 -66 39.1% -0.66 11–2 (85%) 3–7 (30%) — -0.12
24 2016 1645 130.4 -0.24 -0.73 0.944 49.0% +10 -57 +63 44.9% -0.37 5–5 (50%) 3–2 (60%) — -2.53 2016 1555 84.5 -4.79 -2.24 0.516 35.1% -2 — — 0.0% -4.88 — — — -0.31
25 2017 1760 124.4 +1.08 -0.07 0.987 50.1% -52 -146 +35 49.3% +0.18 10–3 (77%) 5–7 (42%) — -1.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2018 1866 142.2 +3.05 +1.65 1.117 52.4% -27 -140 -22 61.6% +0.82 6–5 (55%) 4–1 (80%) — -0.86 2018 1518 94.6 +0.08 -0.64 0.624 40.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.07
27 2019 1750 138.4 -0.54 +0.95 0.989 49.8% +3 — — 50.8% +0.24 3–6 (33%) 4–2 (67%) — -0.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2020 1737 130.8 +0.83 -1.43 0.968 49.3% +18 -34 — 53.2% -0.11 6–5 (55%) 6–0 (100%) — -0.95 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2021 1829 139.7 +1.63 +1.37 1.062 51.2% -14 -167 +30 57.8% +0.65 8–4 (67%) 5–4 (56%) — -1.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2022 1770 135.5 +0.11 +1.41 1.004 50.0% 0 -96 +100 52.1% +0.13 4–9 (31%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2023 1791 142.9 +1.46 +1.59 1.078 51.6% +17 -99 +67 59.7% +0.61 3–5 (38%) 6–4 (60%) — -1.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2024 1762 129.7 +0.86 -0.25 0.860 47.5% +11 — — 42.1% -0.68 1–2 (33%) — — -1.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1900 141.2 +1.54 +0.55 1.033 50.7% -8 -112 +54 52.9% +0.22 66–68 (49%) 56–41 (58%) 104.4 -2.43 — 1736 122.2 -1.90 -0.49 0.912 48.0% +11 -76 -64 41.6% -0.64 46–25 (65%) 18–26 (41%) 107.3 -0.32

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.