H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:30 UTC
Camila Giorgi vs Christina Mchale H2H: 3-1
Camila Giorgi holds a 3–1 lead over Christina Mchale in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Camila Giorgi leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Camila Giorgi won the 2021 Parma third round 6-7(4) 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 34
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 34
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2021* | Parma | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Camila Giorgi | 6-7(4) 6-4 6-4 | Christina Mchale | Match data |
| Aug 19, 2015* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Camila Giorgi | 5-7 6-3 6-2 | Christina Mchale | Match data |
| Jun 24, 2015* | Eastbourne | WTA 500 | R64 | Grass | Camila Giorgi | 6-2 6-3 | Christina Mchale | Match data |
| May 15, 2014* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Christina Mchale | 1-6 6-3 6-1 | Camila Giorgi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Camila Giorgi | #116 | #26 | 1,978 | 1,875 | 204 | 184 | 52.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Christina Mchale | #319 | #24 | 1,935 | 1,803 | 166 | 207 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Camila Giorgi | Christina Mchale | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #231 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #109 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #43 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2012 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #75 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #33 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #98 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #66 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2014 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #34 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #52 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #35 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #63 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2016 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #82 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #45 | 1,698 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2017 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #78 | 1,778 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #64 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2018 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #26 | 1,865 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #151 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2019 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #100 | 1,725 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #88 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #76 | 1,726 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #81 | 1,675 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2021 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #33 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 2–16 | 11.1% | #159 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2022 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #66 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #319 | 1,452 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2023 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #53 | 1,788 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2024 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #116 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |