H2H data updated: 2026-07-25 23:01 UTC
Camila Giorgi vs Jennifer Brady H2H: 1-0
Camila Giorgi holds a 1–0 lead over Jennifer Brady in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Camila Giorgi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Camila Giorgi won the 2021 Tokyo Olympics second round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 34
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 31
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2021* | Tokyo Olympics | Olympics | R64 | Hard | Camila Giorgi | 6-3 6-2 | Jennifer Brady | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Camila Giorgi | #116 | #26 | 1,978 | 1,897 | 207 | 185 | 52.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Jennifer Brady | #618 | #13 | 3,840 | 1,945 | 72 | 77 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Camila Giorgi | Jennifer Brady | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2012 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #75 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #98 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2014 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #34 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #65 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #35 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #115 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2016 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #82 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #55 | 1,761 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #78 | 1,779 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 19–9 | 67.9% | #24 | 1,917 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2018 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #26 | 1,868 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #25 | 1,866 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2019 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #100 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #76 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #233 | 1,846 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2021 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #33 | 1,827 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2022 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #66 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2023 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #53 | 1,790 | 0 | 4 | 2026 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #618 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2024 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #116 | 1,762 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |