H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Camila Giorgi vs Julia Goerges H2H: 3-0
Camila Giorgi holds a 3–0 lead over Julia Goerges in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Camila Giorgi leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Camila Giorgi won the 2016 Indian Wells first round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 34
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2020 | Dubai | WTA 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Julia Goerges | 6-2 6-4 | Camila Giorgi | Match data |
| Mar 11, 2016* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Camila Giorgi | 6-3 6-2 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
| Oct 15, 2015* | Linz | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Camila Giorgi | 6-3 6-4 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
| Oct 10, 2013* | Linz | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Camila Giorgi | 6-2 6-3 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Camila Giorgi | #116 | #26 | 1,978 | 1,875 | 204 | 184 | 52.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Camila Giorgi | Julia Goerges | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #75 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #98 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #34 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #35 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 |
| 2016 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #82 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 |
| 2017 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #78 | 1,778 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 |
| 2018 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #26 | 1,865 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 2019 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #100 | 1,725 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #76 | 1,726 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #33 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 |
| 2022 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #66 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 |
| 2023 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #53 | 1,788 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 |
| 2024 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #116 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 |