H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Camila Giorgi vs Magdalena Rybarikova H2H: 0-2
Magdalena Rybarikova holds a 2–0 lead over Camila Giorgi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Magdalena Rybarikova leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Magdalena Rybarikova won the 2017 US Open first round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 34
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 37
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2017* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Magdalena Rybarikova | 6-3 6-4 | Camila Giorgi | Match data |
| Aug 13, 2017 | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | Q2 | Hard | Camila Giorgi | 6-3 6-4 | Magdalena Rybarikova | Match data |
| Aug 23, 2014* | New Haven | WTA 500 | SF | Hard | Magdalena Rybarikova | 6-2 6-4 | Camila Giorgi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Camila Giorgi | #116 | #26 | 1,978 | 1,875 | 204 | 184 | 52.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Magdalena Rybarikova | #199 | #17 | 2,405 | 1,817 | 188 | 207 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Camila Giorgi | Magdalena Rybarikova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #342 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2012 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #75 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #44 | 1,694 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #98 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #106 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2014 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #34 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #71 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2015 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #35 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #62 | 1,605 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2016 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #82 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #37 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2017 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #78 | 1,778 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #50 | 1,691 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2018 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #26 | 1,865 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #80 | 1,610 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2019 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #100 | 1,725 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,665 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #76 | 1,726 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 19–11 | 63.3% | #20 | 1,794 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2021 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #33 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #48 | 1,677 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2022 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #66 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #176 | 1,608 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2023 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #53 | 1,788 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2024 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #116 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |