H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Camila Giorgi vs Marina Erakovic H2H: 1-0

Camila Giorgi holds a 1–0 lead over Marina Erakovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Camila Giorgi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Camila Giorgi won the 2014 Linz Open quarterfinal 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Camila Giorgi
Italy Age 34 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Marina Erakovic
New Zealand Age 38 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Camila Giorgi #42 6-3 7-5 Marina Erakovic #87 Match data Oct 11, 2014* QF Linz Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Camila Giorgi #116 #26 1,978 1,899 211 188 52.9% 0 1 0 0 3 4
Marina Erakovic #827 #39 1,392 1,695 104 133 43.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Camila Giorgi Marina Erakovic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2005 1–1 50.0% #213 1,498 0 0
19 2011 0–1 0.0% #151 1,486 0 0 2007 1–5 16.7% #153 1,457 0 0
20 2012 6–10 37.5% #75 1,523 0 0 2008 16–17 48.5% #66 1,517 0 0
21 2013 8–11 42.1% #98 1,578 0 0 2009 4–7 36.4% #227 1,514 0 0
22 2014 27–19 58.7% #34 1,709 0 0 2010 2–7 22.2% #333 1,480 0 0
23 2015 26–21 55.3% #35 1,727 0 1 2011 11–8 57.9% #61 1,627 0 0
24 2016 16–20 44.4% #82 1,645 0 1 2012 19–21 47.5% #66 1,583 0 0
25 2017 15–13 53.6% #78 1,759 0 1 2013 20–16 55.6% #46 1,669 0 1
26 2018 29–16 64.4% #26 1,866 0 2 2014 12–20 37.5% #76 1,607 0 1
27 2019 13–15 46.4% #100 1,749 0 2 2015 7–14 33.3% #135 1,542 0 1
28 2020 10–9 52.6% #76 1,736 0 2 2016 10–8 55.6% #106 1,620 0 1
29 2021 24–17 58.5% #33 1,829 0 3 2017 1–9 10.0% #197 1,547 0 1
30 2022 14–16 46.7% #66 1,769 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 2023 20–15 57.1% #53 1,790 0 4 — — — — — — —
32 2024 3–5 37.5% #116 1,762 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Camila Giorgi Marina Erakovic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2011 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2012 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2008 8 11 19 42.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
21 2013 4 5 9 44.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2009 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2014 17 11 28 60.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2010 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
23 2015 17 15 32 53.1% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 2011 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
24 2016 12 13 25 48.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2012 9 10 19 47.4% 7 7 14 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
25 2017 7 7 14 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2013 13 10 23 56.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
26 2018 15 9 24 62.5% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2014 10 13 23 43.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2019 13 13 26 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2015 5 6 11 45.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
28 2020 6 5 11 54.5% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 1 3 4 25.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
29 2021 16 10 26 61.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2017 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2022 5 8 13 38.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2023 13 8 21 61.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2024 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 131 117 248 52.8% 38 40 78 48.7% 42 31 73 57.5% — — — — — 60 83 143 42.0% 20 28 48 41.7% 24 21 45 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 366/400 of Camila Giorgi's and 219/235 of Marina Erakovic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Camila Giorgi Marina Erakovic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2011 1/1 3.0 7.0 53.3% 66.7% 28.6% 33.3% 0.0% 48.9% 26.5% 2007 5/6 2.4 3.6 56.9% 62.4% 42.7% 39.4% 61.3% 54.4% 41.8%
20 2012 16/16 1.7 7.4 53.8% 66.1% 42.4% 53.5% 42.4% 55.1% 43.4% 2008 29/33 5.4 3.4 58.8% 68.1% 47.4% 54.2% 45.7% 59.3% 40.8%
21 2013 16/19 2.0 7.7 56.3% 63.1% 45.2% 50.3% 46.6% 54.9% 42.7% 2009 11/11 3.8 4.9 57.0% 64.8% 38.5% 56.9% 55.6% 53.7% 40.2%
22 2014 44/46 3.2 8.2 53.9% 70.1% 49.0% 53.4% 44.4% 60.3% 43.8% 2010 9/9 4.7 4.1 61.1% 62.6% 41.2% 53.6% 51.8% 54.2% 37.6%
23 2015 36/47 3.1 10.5 60.2% 68.8% 54.7% 56.5% 54.2% 63.0% 41.9% 2011 18/19 4.4 3.1 63.9% 65.5% 44.4% 59.2% 39.3% 58.1% 42.5%
24 2016 32/37 2.0 6.9 56.7% 62.8% 45.8% 51.5% 46.0% 55.4% 42.1% 2012 38/40 3.8 3.4 54.4% 68.8% 46.5% 53.9% 42.7% 58.3% 42.6%
25 2017 27/28 2.9 6.5 56.0% 64.5% 47.9% 50.1% 45.3% 57.4% 42.1% 2013 29/36 4.2 4.9 57.0% 70.7% 45.0% 51.7% 47.3% 59.7% 44.4%
26 2018 43/45 3.5 5.0 59.2% 67.0% 49.8% 51.2% 49.9% 60.1% 44.6% 2014 31/32 2.8 3.8 60.3% 65.6% 42.5% 49.3% 46.9% 56.3% 41.9%
27 2019 25/28 2.7 6.0 55.8% 62.6% 46.0% 48.7% 52.2% 55.2% 44.3% 2015 21/21 3.8 3.6 61.0% 66.3% 50.9% 53.1% 41.0% 60.4% 38.0%
28 2020 19/19 2.7 6.7 56.5% 64.6% 47.6% 49.2% 45.0% 57.4% 41.2% 2016 18/18 2.3 4.4 64.7% 61.7% 44.5% 51.8% 50.1% 56.1% 43.0%
29 2021 34/41 3.5 6.8 54.2% 67.0% 48.5% 46.3% 49.1% 58.5% 44.1% 2017 10/10 2.0 5.6 57.0% 65.1% 39.1% 48.2% 43.8% 54.1% 36.1%
30 2022 30/30 2.4 7.3 54.3% 66.8% 44.8% 45.9% 48.2% 56.7% 43.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2023 35/35 3.0 6.3 56.0% 67.8% 45.8% 56.8% 46.0% 58.2% 45.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2024 8/8 3.8 7.0 54.0% 68.3% 42.3% 64.2% 47.5% 56.5% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 366/400 2.9 7.1 56.2% 66.5% 47.7% 51.6% 47.6% 58.2% 43.2% — 219/237 3.8 3.9 59.0% 66.6% 44.9% 52.7% 46.0% 57.7% 41.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Camila Giorgi Marina Erakovic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1498 95.1 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 — — +0.29
19 2011 1486 95.9 -1.46 -1.61 0.519 37.2% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.13 2007 1457 98.0 -0.61 -2.50 0.916 48.2% +5 — — 21.4% -1.36 1–1 — — +0.10
20 2012 1524 109.2 -0.06 -0.52 0.966 49.3% -40 — +152 37.5% -0.78 0–2 1–1 — +0.04 2008 1518 119.1 +1.94 -2.96 1.003 49.8% -43 +12 +208 48.7% -0.08 6–6 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 99.1 +1.05
21 2013 1578 118.6 -0.28 -0.45 0.945 49.0% -55 -44 +82 45.2% -0.64 1–3 (25%) 4–1 (80%) 101.6 -0.04 2009 1514 108.9 -1.10 -1.98 0.869 47.5% -38 — — 42.3% -0.92 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — -0.07
22 2014 1710 139.3 +3.53 +0.42 1.105 51.9% -5 -132 +5 57.3% +0.60 9–11 (45%) 9–9 (50%) 101.9 +0.57 2010 1480 102.7 -1.18 -3.79 0.820 45.9% -44 — +254 25.0% -1.70 1–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.06
23 2015 1728 132.8 +4.03 +0.45 1.135 52.6% -8 -203 +75 51.9% +0.18 10–8 (56%) 6–5 (55%) 99.6 -0.69 2011 1627 118.5 +1.72 -1.34 1.015 50.1% -74 — +125 55.3% +0.02 5–4 (56%) 1–0 — +0.24
24 2016 1645 130.4 -0.24 -0.73 0.944 49.0% +10 -57 +63 44.9% -0.37 5–5 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 102.1 -2.53 2012 1584 114.0 +1.58 -1.34 1.023 50.5% -11 -33 +124 44.0% -0.37 9–6 (60%) 5–3 (63%) 104.2 +1.89
25 2017 1760 124.4 +1.05 -0.11 0.987 50.1% -52 -146 +35 49.3% +0.18 10–3 (77%) 5–7 (42%) 106.2 -1.25 2013 1670 123.7 +2.86 -0.04 1.101 51.9% -29 -101 +64 53.0% +0.21 7–7 (50%) 10–4 (71%) 106.7 +0.26
26 2018 1866 142.2 +3.05 +1.65 1.117 52.4% -27 -140 -22 61.6% +0.82 6–5 (55%) 4–1 (80%) 104.5 -0.86 2014 1608 123.2 -0.48 -1.04 0.958 49.3% +12 -33 +39 40.8% -0.31 4–5 (44%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.33
27 2019 1750 138.4 -0.54 +0.95 0.989 49.8% +3 — — 50.8% +0.24 3–6 (33%) 4–2 (67%) 95.3 -0.70 2015 1542 117.9 +1.24 -2.64 0.961 48.9% +77 -39 +69 44.7% -0.23 2–7 (22%) 2–3 (40%) 95.1 -0.36
28 2020 1737 130.8 +0.83 -1.43 0.968 49.3% +18 -34 — 53.2% -0.11 6–5 (55%) 6–0 (100%) 104.5 -0.95 2016 1620 110.9 +0.21 -1.18 0.978 49.7% -22 +11 +15 48.7% -0.26 4–3 (57%) 5–4 (56%) 102.4 +0.55
29 2021 1829 139.7 +1.63 +1.37 1.062 51.2% -14 -167 +30 57.8% +0.65 8–4 (67%) 5–4 (56%) 103.6 -1.02 2017 1548 105.9 -0.90 -2.01 0.788 45.4% +27 — — 15.8% -1.84 0–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.44
30 2022 1770 135.5 +0.11 +1.41 1.004 50.0% 0 -96 +100 52.1% +0.13 4–9 (31%) 3–5 (38%) 93.9 +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2023 1791 142.9 +1.46 +1.59 1.078 51.6% +17 -99 +67 59.7% +0.61 3–5 (38%) 6–4 (60%) 99.9 -1.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2024 1762 129.7 +0.86 -0.25 0.860 47.5% +11 — — 42.1% -0.68 1–2 (33%) — — -1.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1900 141.2 +1.54 +0.55 1.033 50.7% -8 -112 +54 52.9% +0.22 66–68 (49%) 56–41 (58%) 104.4 -2.43 — 1696 119.6 +0.96 -1.64 0.979 49.6% -14 -29 +123 44.6% -0.34 41–44 (48%) 31–29 (52%) 102.9 +1.32

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.