H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Camila Giorgi vs Roberta Vinci H2H: 1-2
Roberta Vinci holds a 2–1 lead over Camila Giorgi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Roberta Vinci leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Roberta Vinci won the 2016 Montreal third round 2-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 34
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 43
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2016* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Roberta Vinci | 2-6 6-3 6-4 | Camila Giorgi | Match data |
| Apr 11, 2014* | Katowice | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Camila Giorgi | 6-3 6-7(7) 6-0 | Roberta Vinci | Match data |
| Sep 3, 2013* | US Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Roberta Vinci | 6-4 6-2 | Camila Giorgi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Camila Giorgi | #116 | #26 | 1,978 | 1,875 | 204 | 184 | 52.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Roberta Vinci | #193 | #7 | 3,615 | 1,923 | 320 | 287 | 52.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Camila Giorgi | Roberta Vinci | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #184 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2012 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #75 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #119 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #98 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #116 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2014 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #34 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #41 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #35 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #85 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2016 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #82 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #73 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2017 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #78 | 1,778 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #84 | 1,585 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2018 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #26 | 1,865 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #63 | 1,663 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2019 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #100 | 1,725 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #38 | 1,817 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #76 | 1,726 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #23 | 1,774 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2021 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #33 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 44–27 | 62.0% | #16 | 1,834 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 2022 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #66 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,853 | 0 | 9 |
| 31 | 2023 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #53 | 1,788 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #47 | 1,712 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | 2024 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #116 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #15 | 1,765 | 0 | 9 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #18 | 1,733 | 0 | 10 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #116 | 1,610 | 0 | 10 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #193 | 1,628 | 0 | 10 |