H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Camila Giorgi vs Serena Williams H2H: 0-4

Serena Williams holds a 4–0 lead over Camila Giorgi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Serena Williams leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Serena Williams won the 2020 Auckland third round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Camila Giorgi
ITA Age 34 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 4
4 main draw meetings
Serena Williams
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 9, 2020* Auckland WTA 250 R32 Hard Serena Williams #10 6-3 6-2 Camila Giorgi #99 Match data
Jul 12, 2018* Wimbledon Grand Slam QF Grass Serena Williams #181 3-6 6-3 6-4 Camila Giorgi #52 Match data
Jan 20, 2016* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Serena Williams #1 6-4 7-5 Camila Giorgi #36 Match data
Apr 4, 2013* Charleston WTA 500 R32 Clay Serena Williams #1 6-2 6-3 Camila Giorgi #85 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Camila Giorgi #116 #26 1,978 1,875 204 184 52.6% 0 1 0 2 1 4
Serena Williams #320 #1 13,615 2,405 825 170 82.9% 23 23 5 17 3 71

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Camila Giorgi Serena Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1997 3–2 60.0% #101 1,582 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1998 26–11 70.3% #20 1,895 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1999 37–7 84.1% #4 2,170 1 4
18 — — — — — — — 2000 37–8 82.2% #6 2,174 1 7
19 2011 0–1 0.0% #151 1,486 0 0 2001 40–7 85.1% #6 2,259 1 10
20 2012 6–10 37.5% #75 1,524 0 0 2002 57–5 91.9% #1 2,348 4 18
21 2013 8–11 42.1% #98 1,579 0 0 2003 36–3 92.3% #3 2,369 6 22
22 2014 27–19 58.7% #34 1,710 0 0 2004 39–11 78.0% #7 2,192 6 24
23 2015 26–21 55.3% #35 1,730 0 1 2005 21–9 70.0% #11 2,028 7 25
24 2016 14–19 42.4% #82 1,638 0 1 2006 12–4 75.0% #95 2,016 7 25
25 2017 15–12 55.6% #78 1,778 0 1 2007 34–10 77.3% #7 2,058 8 27
26 2018 28–15 65.1% #26 1,865 0 2 2008 41–8 83.7% #2 2,109 9 31
27 2019 12–15 44.4% #100 1,725 0 2 2009 50–13 79.4% #1 2,106 11 34
28 2020 10–9 52.6% #76 1,726 0 2 2010 25–4 86.2% #4 2,149 13 36
29 2021 21–16 56.8% #33 1,799 0 3 2011 22–4 84.6% #12 2,155 13 38
30 2022 14–16 46.7% #66 1,763 0 3 2012 48–6 88.9% #3 2,239 15 44
31 2023 20–15 57.1% #53 1,788 0 4 2013 77–5 93.9% #1 2,345 17 55
32 2024 3–5 37.5% #116 1,760 0 4 2014 52–10 83.9% #1 2,209 18 62
33 — — — — — — — 2015 50–6 89.3% #1 2,197 21 67
34 — — — — — — — 2016 36–5 87.8% #2 2,177 22 69
35 — — — — — — — 2017 8–1 88.9% #22 2,172 23 70
36 — — — — — — — 2018 18–7 72.0% #16 2,078 23 70
37 — — — — — — — 2019 25–8 75.8% #10 2,052 23 70
38 — — — — — — — 2020 16–5 76.2% #11 1,991 23 71
39 — — — — — — — 2021 12–6 66.7% #41 1,950 23 71
40 — — — — — — — 2022 3–4 42.9% #320 1,891 23 71
44 — — — — — — — 2026 0–1 0.0% #320 — 23 71