H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Camila Giorgi vs Virginie Razzano H2H: 1-0
Camila Giorgi holds a 1–0 lead over Virginie Razzano in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Camila Giorgi leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Camila Giorgi won the 2016 Prague fourth round 6-1 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 34
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 43
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2016* | Prague | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Camila Giorgi | 6-1 7-5 | Virginie Razzano | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Camila Giorgi | #116 | #26 | 1,978 | 1,875 | 204 | 184 | 52.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Virginie Razzano | #1,226 | #16 | 2,420 | 1,876 | 200 | 216 | 48.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Camila Giorgi | Virginie Razzano | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #344 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #143 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #87 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #76 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2012 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #75 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #72 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #98 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #60 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2014 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #34 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #51 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #35 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #88 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2016 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #82 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #28 | 1,805 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2017 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #78 | 1,778 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #58 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2018 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #26 | 1,865 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #19 | 1,801 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2019 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #100 | 1,725 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #113 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #76 | 1,726 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #83 | 1,681 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2021 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #33 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #160 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2022 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #66 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #99 | 1,683 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2023 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #53 | 1,788 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #165 | 1,621 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2024 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #116 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #200 | 1,657 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #169 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 |