H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Camila Giorgi vs Xinyun Han H2H: 1-0
Camila Giorgi holds a 1–0 lead over Xinyun Han in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Camila Giorgi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Camila Giorgi won the 2019 Osaka third round 7-6(6) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 34
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2019* | Osaka | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Camila Giorgi | 7-6(6) 6-1 | Xinyun Han | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Camila Giorgi | #116 | #26 | 1,978 | 1,875 | 204 | 184 | 52.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Xinyun Han | #1,386 | #105 | 597 | 1,565 | 21 | 33 | 38.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Camila Giorgi | Xinyun Han | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #339 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #75 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #98 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #131 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #34 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #324 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #35 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #391 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #82 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #78 | 1,778 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #111 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #26 | 1,865 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #131 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #100 | 1,725 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #159 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #76 | 1,726 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #187 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #33 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #207 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #66 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #53 | 1,788 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #116 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |