H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Camila Osorio vs Christina Mchale H2H: 1-0
Camila Osorio holds a 1–0 lead over Christina Mchale in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Camila Osorio leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Camila Osorio won the 2021 Charleston 2 fourth round 2-6 7-6(2) 7-6(1).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
COL
Age 24
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 34
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2021* | Charleston 2 | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Camila Osorio | 2-6 7-6(2) 7-6(1) | Christina Mchale | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Camila Osorio | #53 | #33 | 1,354 | 1,825 | 100 | 89 | 52.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Christina Mchale | #319 | #24 | 1,935 | 1,803 | 166 | 207 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Camila Osorio | Christina Mchale | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #477 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #207 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #231 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #109 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2021 | 18–11 | 62.1% | #55 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #43 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2022 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #80 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #33 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2023 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #78 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #66 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2024 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #52 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2025 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #77 | 1,716 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #63 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2026 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #53 | 1,793 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #45 | 1,698 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #64 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #151 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #88 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #81 | 1,675 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 2–16 | 11.1% | #159 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #319 | 1,452 | 0 | 1 |