H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Camila Osorio vs Christina Mchale H2H: 1-0

Camila Osorio holds a 1–0 lead over Christina Mchale in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Camila Osorio leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Camila Osorio won the 2021 Charleston 2 second round 2-6 7-6(2) 7-6(1).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Camila Osorio
Colombia Age 24 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Christina Mchale
United States Age 34 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Camila Osorio #135 2-6 7-6(2) 7-6(1) Christina Mchale #91 Match data Apr 16, 2021* R16 Charleston 2 WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Camila Osorio #59 #33 1,354 1,826 104 96 52.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Christina Mchale #319 #24 1,935 1,803 167 210 44.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Camila Osorio Christina Mchale
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2018 0–1 0.0% #477 1,453 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2019 2–1 66.7% #207 1,487 0 0 2009 1–2 33.3% #231 1,499 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2010 8–9 47.1% #109 1,557 0 0
19 2021 18–12 60.0% #55 1,698 0 1 2011 19–17 52.8% #43 1,718 0 0
20 2022 14–16 46.7% #80 1,689 0 1 2012 21–21 50.0% #33 1,668 0 0
21 2023 17–15 53.1% #78 1,731 0 1 2013 13–18 41.9% #66 1,633 0 0
22 2024 18–17 51.4% #59 1,757 0 2 2014 20–21 48.8% #52 1,647 0 0
23 2025 20–17 54.1% #77 1,718 0 3 2015 18–21 46.2% #63 1,623 0 0
24 2026 15–17 46.9% #59 1,744 0 3 2016 25–22 53.2% #45 1,688 0 1
25 — — — — — — — 2017 19–27 41.3% #64 1,682 0 1
26 — — — — — — — 2018 8–17 32.0% #151 1,565 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 2019 7–10 41.2% #88 1,651 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 2020 6–8 42.9% #81 1,675 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2021 2–16 11.1% #159 1,526 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2022 0–1 0.0% #319 1,453 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Camila Osorio Christina Mchale
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2019 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2009 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 6 7 13 46.2% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2021 5 7 12 41.7% 11 3 14 78.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2011 13 12 25 52.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
20 2022 9 9 18 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 2012 13 11 24 54.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2023 7 8 15 46.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2013 9 10 19 47.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2024 7 10 17 41.2% 10 4 14 71.4% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2014 13 14 27 48.1% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
23 2025 11 12 23 47.8% 9 4 13 69.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2015 9 11 20 45.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
24 2026 8 12 20 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2016 17 13 30 56.7% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 16 18 34 47.1% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 5 11 16 31.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1 7 8 12.5% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 47 58 105 44.8% 52 25 77 67.5% 5 13 18 27.8% — — — — — 115 129 244 47.1% 34 51 85 40.0% 16 28 44 36.4% 2 2 4 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 184/202 of Camila Osorio's and 352/378 of Christina Mchale's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Camila Osorio Christina Mchale
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2018 1/1 2.0 4.0 60.0% 61.9% 32.1% 58.3% 28.6% 50.0% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2019 3/3 1.3 7.0 57.8% 62.9% 46.8% 57.1% 41.6% 56.3% 47.6% 2009 3/3 3.0 2.3 59.2% 59.9% 39.0% 56.3% 41.3% 51.5% 45.0%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 16/17 2.8 1.8 61.7% 62.7% 41.5% 46.7% 42.5% 54.2% 41.0%
19 2021 29/30 1.4 5.3 63.1% 61.1% 38.4% 51.1% 49.0% 52.7% 48.0% 2011 35/36 2.8 3.0 60.8% 63.8% 46.4% 52.4% 41.9% 57.0% 43.0%
20 2022 30/31 1.2 4.1 68.6% 59.0% 40.9% 50.2% 44.0% 53.3% 44.7% 2012 40/42 2.7 2.3 64.6% 62.9% 45.5% 51.7% 44.6% 56.6% 41.7%
21 2023 32/32 0.7 5.3 64.2% 60.6% 42.3% 50.7% 40.1% 53.9% 44.9% 2013 26/31 2.2 3.4 62.0% 62.5% 45.8% 51.8% 46.8% 56.4% 42.1%
22 2024 32/35 1.2 5.0 64.8% 58.9% 40.8% 49.3% 52.1% 52.4% 45.4% 2014 40/41 2.5 4.3 59.8% 64.5% 43.8% 53.1% 46.4% 56.1% 43.8%
23 2025 26/38 1.8 6.1 62.6% 61.7% 40.2% 54.1% 46.6% 53.8% 44.7% 2015 30/39 2.3 3.0 62.9% 62.3% 47.3% 54.8% 44.4% 56.7% 37.6%
24 2026 31/32 1.5 5.7 63.7% 62.3% 44.9% 50.3% 52.9% 55.7% 45.9% 2016 44/48 2.9 3.8 59.8% 63.9% 43.4% 51.5% 50.6% 55.7% 45.2%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 43/46 2.7 4.3 60.5% 63.0% 43.1% 58.3% 52.1% 55.0% 44.6%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 25/25 1.5 4.9 60.6% 60.7% 38.8% 54.7% 50.5% 52.3% 42.1%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 17/17 1.4 3.5 63.6% 58.8% 41.6% 49.6% 48.0% 52.4% 46.3%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 14/14 1.4 3.4 64.7% 59.9% 44.8% 46.3% 46.8% 54.5% 41.6%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 18/18 1.6 3.4 63.9% 55.6% 39.5% 47.4% 47.3% 49.7% 41.6%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 1/1 0.0 2.0 68.9% 45.2% 35.7% 50.0% 16.7% 42.2% 34.7%
Career — 184/202 1.3 5.3 64.4% 60.6% 41.4% 51.0% 47.3% 53.7% 45.6% — 352/378 2.4 3.5 61.7% 62.3% 43.8% 52.5% 46.9% 55.1% 42.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Camila Osorio Christina Mchale
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 2016 1483 97.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 2017 1465 97.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2018 1454 96.2 -0.76 -2.99 0.738 43.7% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2019 1488 103.3 +0.83 +0.51 1.091 51.8% — +17 — 62.5% +0.75 1–1 0–1 — +0.10 2009 1499 112.0 -1.43 -0.60 0.927 48.4% +20 — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 — — +0.21
18 2020 1483 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1558 114.8 -0.88 -1.14 0.895 47.6% +8 -2 — 38.2% -0.77 3–1 (75%) 1–0 — +1.19
19 2021 1699 120.1 -2.66 +3.25 1.014 50.4% -108 +13 -63 52.3% +0.08 7–0 (100%) 3–4 (43%) 107.0 -0.69 2011 1718 138.4 +1.67 -0.12 0.999 49.9% -36 -92 -111 49.4% -0.19 6–5 (55%) 9–3 (75%) 105.5 -0.79
20 2022 1689 126.5 -2.72 +0.83 0.957 48.9% -8 +34 -184 48.3% -0.35 3–3 (50%) 9–7 (56%) 104.1 +0.85 2012 1669 131.2 +1.31 -0.92 0.962 49.2% +12 -8 -43 50.5% -0.06 10–9 (53%) 2–6 (25%) 98.5 +0.10
21 2023 1731 132.4 -1.96 +1.86 0.974 49.5% -54 +87 -241 52.9% -0.04 6–2 (75%) 6–3 (67%) 106.3 -2.02 2013 1633 129.7 +0.29 -1.34 0.964 49.2% +46 -17 -42 45.9% -0.43 4–8 (33%) 4–2 (67%) 97.6 +0.57
22 2024 1757 132.8 -3.36 +0.94 0.954 49.1% -66 +105 -187 53.8% +0.01 5–9 (36%) 9–4 (69%) 100.9 -0.70 2014 1648 128.3 +0.05 +0.06 0.998 49.9% +21 -20 -61 46.9% -0.16 9–9 (50%) 3–9 (25%) 95.2 -0.76
23 2025 1719 136.8 -2.42 +1.16 0.969 49.3% -24 +106 — 51.7% +0.08 9–5 (64%) 2–5 (29%) 101.1 -0.23 2015 1624 117.2 -1.05 -2.81 0.869 47.3% -8 -19 +3 48.2% -0.42 5–8 (38%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.01
24 2026 1745 142.0 -1.22 +2.82 1.037 50.9% +16 +70 — 48.7% +0.10 6–7 (46%) 3–7 (30%) 97.1 -1.01 2016 1689 132.8 -0.26 +1.86 1.022 50.6% -20 -71 +21 50.9% +0.02 13–9 (59%) 8–5 (62%) 105.3 -0.48
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1682 134.3 -0.73 +0.47 0.992 50.0% +22 -90 -13 45.4% -0.08 7–11 (39%) 2–12 (14%) 87.9 -0.74
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1565 113.9 -3.09 -1.16 0.882 47.4% +18 -24 — 33.9% -0.96 3–7 (30%) 3–4 (43%) 94.3 -0.53
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1652 124.8 -2.57 +1.92 0.974 49.2% +43 — — 39.0% -0.42 5–2 (71%) 0–2 — -0.25
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1675 129.3 -0.85 -0.02 0.915 48.3% +51 -150 — 45.5% -0.55 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.88
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1526 113.1 -3.71 -1.23 0.828 45.8% +71 -40 -50 25.6% -1.56 0–7 (0%) 5–2 (71%) 95.3 -0.33
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1453 96.2 +3.05 -2.38 0.600 38.3% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.08
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1428 103.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1826 136.1 -2.33 +1.77 0.984 49.7% -34 +69 -164 51.3% -0.01 37–27 (58%) 32–31 (51%) 106.7 -1.82 — 1804 132.0 -0.48 -0.28 0.953 49.0% +13 -42 -28 45.1% -0.35 67–80 (46%) 40–48 (45%) 94.6 -0.73

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.