H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Camila Osorio vs Donna Vekic
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Camila Osorio vs Donna Vekic.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
COL
Age 24
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 30
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Camila Osorio | #53 | #33 | 1,354 | 1,825 | 100 | 89 | 52.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Donna Vekic | #35 | #17 | 2,458 | 1,908 | 230 | 232 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Camila Osorio | Donna Vekic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #477 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #108 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #207 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #82 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2021 | 18–11 | 62.1% | #55 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2022 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #80 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #101 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2023 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #78 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #55 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2024 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #34 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2025 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #77 | 1,716 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #19 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2026 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #53 | 1,793 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #32 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,745 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #67 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #23 | 1,776 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #19 | 1,862 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,734 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #35 | 1,795 | 0 | 5 |