H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:33 UTC
Camila Osorio vs Katie Boulter H2H: 0-2
Katie Boulter holds a 2–0 lead over Camila Osorio in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Katie Boulter leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Katie Boulter won the 2026 Mérida fourth round 6-3 0-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
COL
Age 24
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 29
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2026 | Mérida | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Katie Boulter | 6-3 (ret.) | Camila Osorio | Match data |
| Aug 12, 2023 | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Camila Osorio | 4-6 7-6(5) 1-0 (ret.) | Katie Boulter | Match data |
| Jun 8, 2021* | Nottingham | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Katie Boulter | 6-2 6-3 | Camila Osorio | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Camila Osorio | #53 | #33 | 1,354 | 1,825 | 100 | 89 | 52.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Katie Boulter | #67 | #23 | 1,931 | 1,861 | 93 | 90 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Camila Osorio | Katie Boulter | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #477 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #207 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2021 | 18–11 | 62.1% | #55 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2022 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #80 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2023 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #78 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #97 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2024 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #319 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2025 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #77 | 1,716 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #365 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2026 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #53 | 1,793 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #149 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #136 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #56 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #24 | 1,833 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #106 | 1,753 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #67 | 1,793 | 0 | 4 |