H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Camila Osorio vs Kristie Ahn H2H: 1-0
Camila Osorio holds a 1–0 lead over Kristie Ahn in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Camila Osorio leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Camila Osorio won the 2019 Bogota fourth round 6-4 6-7(6) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
COL
Age 24
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 34
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2019* | Bogota | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Camila Osorio | 6-4 6-7(6) 6-3 | Kristie Ahn | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Camila Osorio | #53 | #33 | 1,354 | 1,825 | 100 | 89 | 52.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Kristie Ahn | #1,053 | #87 | 745 | 1,709 | 16 | 28 | 36.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Camila Osorio | Kristie Ahn | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #477 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #451 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #207 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2021 | 18–11 | 62.1% | #55 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2022 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #80 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2023 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #78 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2024 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #637 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2025 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #77 | 1,716 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2026 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #53 | 1,793 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #112 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #200 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #94 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #108 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #259 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |