H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Camila Osorio vs Madison Brengle H2H: 0-1

Madison Brengle holds a 1–0 lead over Camila Osorio in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Madison Brengle leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Madison Brengle won the 2021 Roland Garros first round 7-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Camila Osorio
Colombia Age 24 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Madison Brengle
United States Age 36 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Madison Brengle #84 7-5 6-4 Camila Osorio #98 Match data Jun 1, 2021* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Camila Osorio #59 #33 1,354 1,826 104 96 52.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Madison Brengle #212 #35 1,324 1,722 94 152 38.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Camila Osorio Madison Brengle
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2018 0–1 0.0% #477 1,453 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2019 2–1 66.7% #207 1,487 0 0 2007 1–3 25.0% #229 1,501 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2008 0–3 0.0% #220 1,457 0 0
19 2021 18–12 60.0% #55 1,698 0 1 2009 1–2 33.3% #165 1,457 0 0
20 2022 14–16 46.7% #80 1,689 0 1 2010 0–1 0.0% #188 1,447 0 0
21 2023 17–15 53.1% #78 1,731 0 1 2011 1–1 50.0% #197 1,460 0 0
22 2024 18–17 51.4% #59 1,757 0 2 2012 0–1 0.0% #191 1,444 0 0
23 2025 20–17 54.1% #77 1,718 0 3 — — — — — — —
24 2026 15–17 46.9% #59 1,744 0 3 2014 4–4 50.0% #95 1,474 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2015 25–26 49.0% #40 1,622 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2016 16–23 41.0% #73 1,591 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2017 10–18 35.7% #83 1,654 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2018 3–11 21.4% #88 1,604 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2019 7–11 38.9% #95 1,601 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2020 2–4 33.3% #82 1,644 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2021 6–14 30.0% #59 1,645 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2022 12–16 42.9% #57 1,630 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2023 6–14 30.0% #151 1,583 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Camila Osorio Madison Brengle
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2019 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2007 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 2021 5 7 12 41.7% 11 3 14 78.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 2009 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2022 9 9 18 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2023 7 8 15 46.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 2011 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2024 7 10 17 41.2% 10 4 14 71.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 2012 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2025 11 12 23 47.8% 9 4 13 69.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2026 8 12 20 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2014 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 19 16 35 54.3% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 10 16 26 38.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 6 14 20 30.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1 7 8 12.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 4 7 11 36.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 2 8 10 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 10 10 20 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 4 9 13 30.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
Career — 47 58 105 44.8% 52 25 77 67.5% 5 13 18 27.8% — 65 103 168 38.7% 17 31 48 35.4% 12 18 30 40.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 184/202 of Camila Osorio's and 225/246 of Madison Brengle's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Camila Osorio Madison Brengle
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2018 1/1 2.0 4.0 60.0% 61.9% 32.1% 58.3% 28.6% 50.0% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2019 3/3 1.3 7.0 57.8% 62.9% 46.8% 57.1% 41.6% 56.3% 47.6% 2007 4/4 0.8 3.0 60.2% 57.4% 40.8% 48.9% 50.7% 50.5% 41.0%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 2/3 0.0 3.0 66.3% 49.4% 35.3% 12.5% 63.6% 45.2% 37.3%
19 2021 29/30 1.4 5.3 63.1% 61.1% 38.4% 51.1% 49.0% 52.7% 48.0% 2009 3/3 0.0 3.7 61.8% 56.2% 38.6% 41.1% 37.6% 49.3% 43.5%
20 2022 30/31 1.2 4.1 68.6% 59.0% 40.9% 50.2% 44.0% 53.3% 44.7% 2010 1/1 1.0 7.0 53.7% 44.4% 38.7% 50.0% 50.0% 41.8% 47.2%
21 2023 32/32 0.7 5.3 64.2% 60.6% 42.3% 50.7% 40.1% 53.9% 44.9% 2011 2/2 0.5 3.5 63.9% 56.3% 44.7% 38.9% 40.0% 52.0% 35.6%
22 2024 32/35 1.2 5.0 64.8% 58.9% 40.8% 49.3% 52.1% 52.4% 45.4% 2012 1/1 5.0 8.0 65.2% 61.3% 35.0% 30.0% 83.3% 52.2% 41.7%
23 2025 26/38 1.8 6.1 62.6% 61.7% 40.2% 54.1% 46.6% 53.8% 44.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2026 31/32 1.5 5.7 63.7% 62.3% 44.9% 50.3% 52.9% 55.7% 45.9% 2014 7/8 0.7 3.0 66.2% 62.5% 42.8% 49.4% 47.3% 55.7% 44.3%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 35/51 1.7 1.9 66.0% 61.5% 48.8% 42.8% 46.6% 57.2% 41.3%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 37/39 0.9 2.2 68.5% 56.8% 45.7% 46.0% 54.9% 53.2% 43.1%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 28/28 0.1 2.5 73.3% 54.5% 39.2% 43.7% 45.2% 50.6% 44.1%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 14/14 0.4 2.7 66.6% 50.4% 43.5% 42.0% 45.0% 48.4% 43.5%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 18/18 0.2 2.2 73.8% 51.9% 37.5% 39.8% 54.6% 48.3% 47.2%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 6/6 0.2 3.7 72.6% 50.8% 44.5% 45.3% 38.1% 49.0% 48.3%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 20/20 0.0 3.1 74.5% 55.6% 39.8% 42.5% 48.0% 51.4% 44.1%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 27/28 0.4 2.9 73.1% 55.8% 39.7% 41.5% 47.1% 51.3% 44.0%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 20/20 0.3 2.7 75.1% 54.6% 41.7% 40.9% 51.5% 51.4% 43.0%
Career — 184/202 1.3 5.3 64.4% 60.6% 41.4% 51.0% 47.3% 53.7% 45.6% — 225/246 0.6 2.6 70.3% 55.9% 42.5% 42.8% 49.0% 52.0% 43.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Camila Osorio Madison Brengle
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 2016 1483 97.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 2017 1465 97.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2018 1454 96.2 -0.76 -2.99 0.738 43.7% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2019 1488 103.3 +0.83 +0.51 1.091 51.8% — +17 — 62.5% +0.75 1–1 0–1 — +0.10 2007 1502 111.1 0.00 +0.02 0.829 46.5% +16 — — 25.0% -1.75 — — — -0.27
18 2020 1483 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1458 92.5 -3.04 -1.39 0.681 41.4% — — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 — — +0.40
19 2021 1699 120.1 -2.66 +3.25 1.014 50.4% -108 +13 -63 52.3% +0.08 7–0 (100%) 3–4 (43%) 107.0 -0.69 2009 1457 101.5 -2.95 -0.91 0.858 46.1% — — — 33.3% -1.17 — 0–1 — +0.06
20 2022 1689 126.5 -2.72 +0.83 0.957 48.9% -8 +34 -184 48.3% -0.35 3–3 (50%) 9–7 (56%) 104.1 +0.85 2010 1447 99.2 -3.58 -2.65 0.810 44.2% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — 0.00
21 2023 1731 132.4 -1.96 +1.86 0.974 49.5% -54 +87 -241 52.9% -0.04 6–2 (75%) 6–3 (67%) 106.3 -2.02 2011 1460 101.5 -2.09 -1.94 0.741 44.6% — — — 50.0% -1.25 — 1–0 — +0.03
22 2024 1757 132.8 -3.36 +0.94 0.954 49.1% -66 +105 -187 53.8% +0.01 5–9 (36%) 9–4 (69%) 100.9 -0.70 2012 1444 99.4 -2.21 +0.67 0.871 47.4% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.16
23 2025 1719 136.8 -2.42 +1.16 0.969 49.3% -24 +106 — 51.7% +0.08 9–5 (64%) 2–5 (29%) 101.1 -0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2026 1745 142.0 -1.22 +2.82 1.037 50.9% +16 +70 — 48.7% +0.10 6–7 (46%) 3–7 (30%) 97.1 -1.01 2014 1474 113.6 -0.29 +1.12 1.002 50.0% +31 — — 42.9% -0.64 0–2 1–1 — +0.14
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1622 128.8 -0.60 -0.18 0.964 49.3% +5 -83 — 48.7% -0.07 7–8 (47%) 6–6 (50%) 100.8 +0.20
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1592 127.1 -1.99 +0.54 0.921 48.3% +5 -75 +29 42.4% -0.75 7–6 (54%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 -1.69
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1654 130.5 -4.01 +1.14 0.892 47.3% -26 -55 -1 38.2% -0.78 6–6 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 102.1 -1.74
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1605 118.6 -4.52 +0.81 0.843 45.8% -20 -29 — 33.3% -1.36 2–5 (29%) 0–2 — -1.35
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1602 115.2 -5.23 +2.99 0.913 47.8% -46 -26 — 42.1% -0.68 0–2 2–1 (67%) — -0.29
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1644 121.9 -2.92 +1.95 0.947 48.8% -1 — — 42.9% -1.07 0–2 2–0 — -0.11
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1645 119.5 -3.17 +0.46 0.907 47.7% +15 -91 +14 34.8% -1.00 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.62
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1631 135.0 -3.81 +1.21 0.902 47.6% +61 -46 -100 42.6% -0.72 3–3 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.1 -0.90
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1583 118.6 -4.39 -0.51 0.886 47.1% +13 +7 -81 34.9% -1.26 0–5 (0%) 4–4 (50%) 95.1 -0.79
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1572 102.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1521 97.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1826 136.1 -2.33 +1.77 0.984 49.7% -34 +69 -164 51.3% -0.01 37–27 (58%) 32–31 (51%) 106.7 -1.82 — 1723 129.4 -2.95 +0.67 0.906 47.8% +6 -59 -14 40.6% -0.76 27–45 (38%) 25–22 (53%) 98.9 -2.77

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.