H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Camila Osorio vs Mayar Sherif H2H: 1-2
Mayar Sherif holds a 2–1 lead over Camila Osorio in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Mayar Sherif leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mayar Sherif won the 2023 Palermo quarterfinal 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
COL
Age 24
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
EGY
Age 30
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2023* | Palermo | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Mayar Sherif | 6-4 6-1 | Camila Osorio | Match data |
| Mar 2, 2023* | Monterrey | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Mayar Sherif | 7-6(5) 4-2 (ret.) | Camila Osorio | Match data |
| Oct 22, 2021* | Tenerife | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Camila Osorio | 6-4 6-2 | Mayar Sherif | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Camila Osorio | #53 | #33 | 1,354 | 1,825 | 100 | 89 | 52.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Mayar Sherif | #97 | #31 | 1,385 | 1,831 | 44 | 77 | 36.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Camila Osorio | Mayar Sherif | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #477 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #207 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2021 | 18–11 | 62.1% | #55 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2022 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #80 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2023 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #78 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2024 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2025 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #77 | 1,716 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2026 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #53 | 1,793 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #128 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #63 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #52 | 1,782 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #59 | 1,713 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #65 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–13 | 7.1% | #109 | 1,673 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #97 | 1,779 | 0 | 1 |