H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Camila Osorio vs Ons Jabeur H2H: 0-5
Ons Jabeur holds a 5–0 lead over Camila Osorio in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Ons Jabeur leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ons Jabeur won the 2025 Australian Open second round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
COL
Age 24
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
5
5 main draw meetings
TUN
Age 31
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2025 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Ons Jabeur | 7-5 6-3 | Camila Osorio | Match data |
| Jun 13, 2024* | Nottingham | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Ons Jabeur | 6-2 6-3 | Camila Osorio | Match data |
| May 30, 2024* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Ons Jabeur | 6-3 1-6 6-3 | Camila Osorio | Match data |
| Aug 30, 2023* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Ons Jabeur | 7-5 7-6(4) | Camila Osorio | Match data |
| Sep 2, 2021* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Ons Jabeur | 6-0 6-1 | Camila Osorio | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Camila Osorio | #53 | #33 | 1,354 | 1,825 | 100 | 89 | 52.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Ons Jabeur | #439 | #2 | 5,210 | 2,105 | 222 | 151 | 59.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Camila Osorio | Ons Jabeur | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #477 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #207 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #260 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2021 | 18–11 | 62.1% | #55 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #143 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2022 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #80 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #220 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2023 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #78 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2024 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #88 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2025 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #77 | 1,716 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #60 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2026 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #53 | 1,793 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #76 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #31 | 1,858 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #10 | 1,982 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 47–17 | 73.4% | #2 | 2,007 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #6 | 1,952 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #42 | 1,856 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #75 | 1,820 | 0 | 5 |