H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:17 UTC
Camila Osorio vs Tereza Martincova H2H: 2-1
Camila Osorio holds a 2–1 lead over Tereza Martincova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Camila Osorio leads 2–0 on clay, while Tereza Martincova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Camila Osorio won the 2026 Rabat third round 6-0 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
COL
Age 24
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 31
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2026 | Rabat | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Camila Osorio | 6-0 6-4 | Tereza Martincova | Match data |
| Sep 29, 2021* | Chicago 2 | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Tereza Martincova | 6-3 7-5 | Camila Osorio | Match data |
| Apr 9, 2021* | Bogota | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Camila Osorio | 6-3 6-3 | Tereza Martincova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Camila Osorio | #53 | #33 | 1,354 | 1,825 | 100 | 89 | 52.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Tereza Martincova | #283 | #40 | 1,293 | 1,800 | 70 | 102 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Camila Osorio | Tereza Martincova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #477 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #207 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #296 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2021 | 18–11 | 62.1% | #55 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2022 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #80 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #180 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2023 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #78 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #163 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2024 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #142 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2025 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #77 | 1,716 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #197 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2026 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #53 | 1,793 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #135 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #120 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #48 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #71 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #155 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #331 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #283 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |