H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Camille Benjamin vs Louise Allen H2H: 1-3
Louise Allen holds a 3–1 lead over Camille Benjamin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Louise Allen leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Camille Benjamin leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Camille Benjamin won the 1989 Worcester third round 3-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 60
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
Age 64
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 1989* | Worcester | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Camille Benjamin | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | Louise Allen | Match data |
| Jul 18, 1982* | Houston Nike | WTA 250 | F | — | Louise Allen | 6-2 6-1 | Camille Benjamin | Match data |
| Jul 10, 1982* | Oklahoma City | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Louise Allen | 2-6 6-2 6-2 | Camille Benjamin | Match data |
| Jun 18, 1982* | Flemington | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Louise Allen | 0-6 6-1 6-2 | Camille Benjamin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Camille Benjamin | #1,000 | #27 | 13 | 1,834 | 177 | 223 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Louise Allen | — | — | — | 1,759 | 67 | 100 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Camille Benjamin | Louise Allen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1982 | 21–14 | 60.0% | — | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1983 | 22–25 | 46.8% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1984 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #33 | 1,774 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 22–29 | 43.1% | #62 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 6–5 | 54.5% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #79 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 22–5 | 81.5% | — | 1,737 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1987 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #67 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,706 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1988 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #91 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,686 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1989 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #92 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1990 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #136 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1991 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #225 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1992 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #251 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #276 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #251 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 2–8 | 20.0% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 10–14 | 41.7% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,451 | 0 | 3 |