H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Candy Reynolds vs Kathy Horvath H2H: 1-3
Kathy Horvath holds a 3–1 lead over Candy Reynolds in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Kathy Horvath leads 3–0 on clay, while Candy Reynolds leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Kathy Horvath won the 1986 Hilton Head second round 6-3 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 71
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 1986* | Hilton Head | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Kathy Horvath | 6-3 7-6 | Candy Reynolds | Match data |
| May 12, 1982* | Lugano | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Kathy Horvath | 7-5 6-3 | Candy Reynolds | Match data |
| Jan 4, 1982 | Washington | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Candy Reynolds | 6-3 6-2 | Kathy Horvath | Match data |
| Apr 22, 1981* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Kathy Horvath | 7-5 6-4 | Candy Reynolds | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Candy Reynolds | #485 | #76 | 5 | 1,859 | 84 | 140 | 37.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kathy Horvath | #283 | #10 | 24 | 1,977 | 192 | 155 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Candy Reynolds | Kathy Horvath | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 11–7 | 61.1% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 1975 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 34–23 | 59.6% | — | 1,872 | 0 | 2 |
| 1976 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 15–17 | 46.9% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 2 |
| 1977 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,419 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 39–18 | 68.4% | — | 1,936 | 0 | 4 |
| 1978 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,412 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #29 | 1,800 | 0 | 4 |
| 1980 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #34 | 1,776 | 0 | 6 |
| 1981 | 19–17 | 52.8% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #47 | 1,740 | 0 | 6 |
| 1982 | 17–22 | 43.6% | — | 1,799 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #37 | 1,714 | 0 | 7 |
| 1983 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,706 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #85 | 1,603 | 0 | 7 |
| 1984 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #224 | 1,530 | 0 | 7 |
| 1985 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #107 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #127 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #177 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #251 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #485 | 1,421 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |