H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Candy Reynolds vs Pam Casale H2H: 0-2

Pam Casale holds a 2–0 lead over Candy Reynolds in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Pam Casale leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pam Casale won the 1986 Roland Garros round of 128 6-0 3-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Candy Reynolds
USA Age 71 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Pam Casale
USA Age 62 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pam Casale #33 6-0 3-6 6-3 Candy Reynolds Match data May 28, 1986* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Pam Casale 6-1 6-3 Candy Reynolds Match data Oct 12, 1985* QF Indianapolis 2 WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Candy Reynolds #485 #76 5 1,823 84 140 37.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pam Casale #671 #14 22 1,944 168 147 53.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Candy Reynolds Pam Casale
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1980 15–10 60.0% — 1,597 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1981 30–17 63.8% — 1,810 0 0
18 1973 1–1 50.0% — 1,498 0 0 1982 20–23 46.5% — 1,745 0 0
19 1974 1–2 33.3% — 1,487 0 0 1983 23–20 53.5% — 1,770 0 0
20 1975 2–6 25.0% — 1,464 0 0 1984 31–17 64.6% #15 1,914 0 0
21 1976 1–2 33.3% — 1,457 0 0 1985 24–20 54.5% #14 1,814 0 0
22 1977 1–8 11.1% — 1,427 0 0 1986 16–17 48.5% #41 1,787 0 0
23 1978 1–4 20.0% — 1,419 0 0 1987 5–11 31.2% #111 1,673 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 1988 4–10 28.6% #169 1,552 0 0
25 1980 12–13 48.0% — 1,613 0 0 1989 0–1 0.0% #225 1,547 0 0
26 1981 19–17 52.8% — 1,784 0 0 1990 0–1 0.0% #554 1,525 0 0
27 1982 17–22 43.6% — 1,779 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 1983 8–13 38.1% — 1,696 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 1984 6–12 33.3% #109 1,626 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 1985 6–9 40.0% #107 1,605 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 1986 6–16 27.3% #127 1,547 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 1987 2–7 22.2% #177 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 1988 1–6 14.3% #251 1,439 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 1989 0–2 0.0% #485 1,421 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Candy Reynolds Pam Casale
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 17 6 23 73.9% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0%
18 1973 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 10 16 37.5%
19 1974 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1983 5 5 10 50.0% 13 8 21 61.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
20 1975 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1984 8 3 11 72.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 6 17 64.7%
21 1976 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1985 17 7 24 70.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
22 1977 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 3 6 9 33.3% 11 5 16 68.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
23 1978 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1987 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 1980 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 1981 5 5 10 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 1982 2 5 7 28.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1983 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1984 5 7 12 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1985 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1986 1 6 7 14.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1987 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1988 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1989 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 27 41 68 39.7% 10 35 45 22.2% 21 33 54 38.9% 23 27 50 46.0% — 66 49 115 57.4% 55 41 96 57.3% 15 19 34 44.1% 25 35 60 41.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Candy Reynolds Pam Casale
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1598 118.7 — — — — +29 — — 57.4% +0.72 3–3 (50%) 1–1 — +2.02
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1811 140.3 — — — — -1 -153 -196 64.1% +1.03 3–6 (33%) 6–0 (100%) 101.9 +1.97
18 1973 1498 97.4 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.40 1–0 — — +0.48 1982 1745 140.3 — — — — -54 -4 -106 50.5% +0.01 1–8 (11%) 9–5 (64%) 95.5 -3.37
19 1974 1487 97.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.50 — — — +0.44 1983 1770 144.1 — — — — -55 +93 -103 52.1% +0.47 5–3 (63%) 3–3 (50%) 102.6 -1.57
20 1975 1465 110.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.94 0–2 1–1 — +0.27 1984 1914 155.3 — — — — +6 -60 -210 64.8% +1.01 3–6 (33%) 7–3 (70%) 100.3 -2.46
21 1976 1458 94.8 — — — — — — — 28.6% -2.14 1–0 1–0 — +0.04 1985 1814 137.6 — — — — +80 -54 -188 53.1% +0.34 6–4 (60%) 3–3 (50%) 98.8 -1.08
22 1977 1428 98.6 — — — — — +29 — 26.3% -1.37 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 96.1 +0.66 1986 1788 137.1 — — — — -56 +52 — 46.8% -0.18 7–4 (64%) 6–3 (67%) 103.7 -3.63
23 1978 1419 102.1 — — — — — +33 — 20.0% -2.00 — — — +0.25 1987 1673 114.3 — — — — -20 — -77 41.7% -0.56 3–5 (38%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.50
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1552 100.5 — — — — +25 +207 — 36.4% -0.79 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 92.4 +1.01
25 1980 1614 126.1 — — — — +14 — -59 50.0% -0.18 4–6 (40%) 2–3 (40%) 98.3 +0.22 1989 1547 93.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.21
26 1981 1785 142.7 — — — — +14 -229 -170 51.9% +0.07 7–4 (64%) 4–2 (67%) 109.6 +0.26 1990 1526 90.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.21
27 1982 1780 138.5 — — — — -91 -230 -26 39.8% -0.77 8–3 (73%) 3–5 (38%) 106.1 -3.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1983 1697 121.3 — — — — -13 — — 45.0% -0.08 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.5 -0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1984 1626 111.1 — — — — +4 -102 +104 40.5% -0.57 1–5 (17%) 1–1 — +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1985 1606 107.8 — — — — +51 — +36 44.4% -0.56 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 98.0 +1.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1986 1547 124.1 — — — — +31 -67 +100 35.4% -0.77 1–5 (17%) 0–2 — +0.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1987 1492 95.2 — — — — +50 -70 — 28.6% -1.52 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1988 1440 91.2 — — — — +52 — — 20.0% -2.47 0–1 1–0 — +0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1989 1421 93.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1824 126.8 — — — — -2 -119 -28 40.6% -0.67 28–37 (43%) 19–22 (46%) 98.6 +0.70 — 1944 143.5 — — — — +1 +5 -153 53.9% +0.36 32–43 (43%) 38–21 (64%) 100.1 -2.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.