H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Candy Reynolds vs Yvonne Vermaak H2H: 1-1
Candy Reynolds and Yvonne Vermaak are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Candy Reynolds leads 1–0 on carpet, while Yvonne Vermaak leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Candy Reynolds won the 1985 New Orleans third round 6-2 5-7 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 71
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 69
Right-Handed
155 cm / 5'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 1985* | New Orleans | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Candy Reynolds | 6-2 5-7 6-2 | Yvonne Vermaak | Match data |
| Feb 12, 1983* | Indianapolis Indoors | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Yvonne Vermaak | 7-6 3-6 6-2 | Candy Reynolds | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Candy Reynolds | #485 | #76 | 5 | 1,859 | 84 | 140 | 37.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Yvonne Vermaak | #558 | #38 | 10 | 1,891 | 239 | 249 | 49.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Candy Reynolds | Yvonne Vermaak | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 15–12 | 55.6% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 8–10 | 44.4% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1975 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 20–14 | 58.8% | — | 1,766 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1976 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 29–23 | 55.8% | — | 1,797 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1977 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,419 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 15–23 | 39.5% | — | 1,781 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1978 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,412 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 19–18 | 51.4% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 19–28 | 40.4% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1980 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 36–27 | 57.1% | — | 1,819 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1981 | 19–17 | 52.8% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 33–26 | 55.9% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1982 | 17–22 | 43.6% | — | 1,799 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 29–28 | 50.9% | #41 | 1,801 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1983 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,706 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #41 | 1,605 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 1984 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #104 | 1,565 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 1985 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #107 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #201 | 1,558 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 1986 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #127 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,542 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 1987 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #177 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1988 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #251 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #485 | 1,421 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |