H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Carla Suárez Navarro vs Andrea Petkovic H2H: 5-3

Carla Suárez Navarro holds a 5–3 lead over Andrea Petkovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Carla Suárez Navarro leads 4–3 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Carla Suárez Navarro won the 2016 Birmingham fourth round 4-6 7-6(5) 7-6(5).

ESP Age 37 Right-Handed 162 cm / 5'4"
H2H
5 3
8 main draw meetings
GER Age 38 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 17, 2016* Birmingham WTA 250 R16 Grass Carla Suárez Navarro #15 4-6 7-6(5) 7-6(5) Andrea Petkovic #33 Match data
Nov 2, 2015 Zhuhai WTA 500 RR Hard Carla Suárez Navarro #12 6-0 6-0 Andrea Petkovic #24 Match data
Mar 28, 2015* Miami WTA 1000 SF Hard Carla Suárez Navarro #12 6-3 6-3 Andrea Petkovic #10 Match data
Feb 15, 2015* Antwerp WTA 500 F Hard Andrea Petkovic #12 (w/o) Carla Suárez Navarro #17 Match data
Oct 27, 2014 Tournament of Champions WTA Finals RR Hard Carla Suárez Navarro #18 6-0 6-4 Andrea Petkovic #17 Match data
Oct 6, 2011* Beijing WTA 1000 R32 Hard Andrea Petkovic #11 6-4 6-4 Carla Suárez Navarro #58 Match data
Sep 6, 2011* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Andrea Petkovic #11 6-1 6-4 Carla Suárez Navarro #76 Match data
Jan 21, 2010* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Carla Suárez Navarro #33 6-1 6-4 Andrea Petkovic #49 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Carla Suárez Navarro #342 #6 4,015 2,022 339 247 57.8% 0 1 0 0 1 2
Andrea Petkovic #139 #9 4,640 1,990 273 225 54.8% 0 0 1 3 3 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Carla Suárez Navarro Andrea Petkovic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2006 0–1 0.0% #242 1,497 0 0
19 2008 13–11 54.2% #49 1,567 0 0 2007 2–4 33.3% #93 1,502 0 0
20 2009 29–25 53.7% #33 1,648 0 0 2008 0–1 0.0% #378 1,500 0 0
21 2010 21–14 60.0% #57 1,696 0 0 2009 11–8 57.9% #55 1,613 0 1
22 2011 15–12 55.6% #56 1,682 0 0 2010 33–24 57.9% #32 1,796 0 1
23 2012 23–24 48.9% #34 1,676 0 0 2011 50–17 74.6% #10 1,975 0 2
24 2013 41–26 61.2% #17 1,812 0 0 2012 9–9 50.0% #125 1,857 0 2
25 2014 50–25 66.7% #17 1,835 0 1 2013 19–14 57.6% #43 1,798 0 2
26 2015 41–25 62.1% #13 1,787 0 1 2014 39–22 63.9% #13 1,826 0 5
27 2016 35–19 64.8% #12 1,812 0 2 2015 29–25 53.7% #24 1,685 0 6
28 2017 26–23 53.1% #40 1,749 0 2 2016 19–19 50.0% #55 1,702 0 6
29 2018 27–19 58.7% #23 1,826 0 2 2017 9–20 31.0% #99 1,631 0 6
30 2019 16–18 47.1% #54 1,742 0 2 2018 13–13 50.0% #64 1,700 0 6
31 2020 2–3 40.0% #84 1,717 0 2 2019 16–19 45.7% #78 1,712 0 6
32 2021 0–3 0.0% #342 1,688 0 2 2020 0–1 0.0% #102 1,697 0 6
33 2021 16–16 50.0% #75 1,730 0 7
34 2022 8–12 40.0% #139 1,707 0 7