H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Carla Suárez Navarro vs Coco Vandeweghe H2H: 2-2
Carla Suárez Navarro and Coco Vandeweghe are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Carla Suárez Navarro leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Coco Vandeweghe leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Coco Vandeweghe won the 2017 Madrid fourth round 5-7 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 37
Right-Handed
162 cm / 5'4"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2017* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Coco Vandeweghe | 5-7 6-4 7-5 | Carla Suárez Navarro | Match data |
| Mar 23, 2016* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Coco Vandeweghe | 6-4 6-2 | Carla Suárez Navarro | Match data |
| Aug 28, 2014* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Carla Suárez Navarro | 6-3 6-3 | Coco Vandeweghe | Match data |
| Aug 29, 2013* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Carla Suárez Navarro | 6-3 6-4 | Coco Vandeweghe | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carla Suárez Navarro | #342 | #6 | 4,015 | 2,022 | 339 | 247 | 57.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Coco Vandeweghe | #815 | #9 | 3,258 | 1,877 | 138 | 151 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Carla Suárez Navarro | Coco Vandeweghe | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #549 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #476 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #322 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #116 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2008 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #49 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #122 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #33 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #97 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #113 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2011 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #56 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #39 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2012 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #34 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #37 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2013 | 41–26 | 61.2% | #17 | 1,812 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #36 | 1,726 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2014 | 50–25 | 66.7% | #17 | 1,835 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #10 | 1,856 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2015 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #13 | 1,787 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #100 | 1,688 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2016 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #12 | 1,812 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #241 | 1,688 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2017 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #40 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2018 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #23 | 1,826 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #174 | 1,592 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2019 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #54 | 1,742 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #128 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2020 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,717 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #420 | 1,533 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2021 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #342 | 1,688 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |