H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Carla Suárez Navarro vs Dominika Cibulkova H2H: 2-5

Dominika Cibulkova holds a 5–2 lead over Carla Suárez Navarro in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Dominika Cibulkova leads 5–1 on hard courts, while Carla Suárez Navarro leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Dominika Cibulkova won the 2017 Toray Pan Pacific Open third round 6-3 6-3.

ESP Age 37 Right-Handed 162 cm / 5'4"
H2H
2 5
7 main draw meetings
SVK Age 37 Right-Handed 161 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 21, 2017* Toray Pan Pacific Open WTA 500 R32 Hard Dominika Cibulkova #9 6-3 6-3 Carla Suárez Navarro #36 Match data
Oct 15, 2016* Linz WTA 500 SF Hard Dominika Cibulkova #10 6-4 6-3 Carla Suárez Navarro #12 Match data
May 28, 2016* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Carla Suárez Navarro #14 6-4 3-6 6-1 Dominika Cibulkova #25 Match data
Oct 23, 2015* Moscow WTA 500 R16 Hard Carla Suárez Navarro #14 6-4 7-5 Dominika Cibulkova #33 Match data
Sep 25, 2015* Tokyo WTA 500 R16 Hard Dominika Cibulkova #48 6-4 6-4 Carla Suárez Navarro #10 Match data
Oct 27, 2014 Tournament of Champions WTA Finals RR Hard Dominika Cibulkova #12 7-5 6-4 Carla Suárez Navarro #18 Match data
Jan 19, 2014* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Dominika Cibulkova #24 6-1 6-0 Carla Suárez Navarro #16 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Carla Suárez Navarro #342 #6 4,015 2,022 339 247 57.8% 0 1 0 0 1 2
Dominika Cibulkova #315 #4 5,245 1,966 365 261 58.3% 0 0 1 5 2 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Carla Suárez Navarro Dominika Cibulkova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2006 2–2 50.0% #153 1,506 0 0
18 2007 17–17 50.0% #51 1,605 0 0
19 2008 13–11 54.2% #49 1,567 0 0 2008 34–25 57.6% #19 1,840 0 0
20 2009 29–25 53.7% #33 1,648 0 0 2009 20–17 54.1% #28 1,733 0 0
21 2010 21–14 60.0% #57 1,696 0 0 2010 30–24 55.6% #31 1,753 0 0
22 2011 15–12 55.6% #56 1,682 0 0 2011 41–21 66.1% #18 1,893 0 1
23 2012 23–24 48.9% #34 1,676 0 0 2012 34–25 57.6% #15 1,810 0 2
24 2013 41–26 61.2% #17 1,812 0 0 2013 27–23 54.0% #23 1,738 0 3
25 2014 50–25 66.7% #17 1,835 0 1 2014 33–22 60.0% #10 1,721 0 4
26 2015 41–25 62.1% #13 1,787 0 1 2015 19–16 54.3% #38 1,757 0 4
27 2016 35–19 64.8% #12 1,812 0 2 2016 53–21 71.6% #5 1,951 0 8
28 2017 26–23 53.1% #40 1,749 0 2 2017 26–22 54.2% #26 1,778 0 8
29 2018 27–19 58.7% #23 1,826 0 2 2018 27–18 60.0% #25 1,865 0 8
30 2019 16–18 47.1% #54 1,742 0 2 2019 2–8 20.0% #315 1,764 0 8
31 2020 2–3 40.0% #84 1,717 0 2
32 2021 0–3 0.0% #342 1,688 0 2