H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Carla Suárez Navarro vs Kim Clijsters H2H: 0-2

Kim Clijsters holds a 2–0 lead over Carla Suárez Navarro in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kim Clijsters leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kim Clijsters won the 2012 London Olympics second round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Carla Suárez Navarro
ESP Age 38 Right-Handed 162 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Kim Clijsters
BEL Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kim Clijsters #36 6-3 6-3 Carla Suárez Navarro #44 Match data Aug 1, 2012* R32 London Olympics Olympics Grass
Kim Clijsters #3 6-1 6-3 Carla Suárez Navarro #62 Match data Jan 21, 2011* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Carla Suárez Navarro #342 #6 4,015 2,031 343 253 57.6% 0 1 0 0 1 2
Kim Clijsters #1,140 #1 8,895 2,299 466 128 78.5% 4 7 3 18 9 41

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Carla Suárez Navarro Kim Clijsters
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1999 16–7 69.6% #46 1,724 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 2000 28–15 65.1% #18 1,913 0 3
18 — — — — — — — 2001 54–19 74.0% #5 2,036 0 6
19 2008 13–12 52.0% #49 1,556 0 0 2002 50–17 74.6% #4 2,146 0 10
20 2009 29–25 53.7% #33 1,648 0 0 2003 86–12 87.8% #2 2,261 0 19
21 2010 21–14 60.0% #57 1,696 0 0 2004 18–4 81.8% #22 2,246 0 21
22 2011 15–12 55.6% #56 1,682 0 0 2005 66–9 88.0% #2 2,234 1 30
23 2012 24–25 49.0% #34 1,685 0 0 2006 41–12 77.4% #5 2,165 1 33
24 2013 41–26 61.2% #17 1,811 0 0 2007 14–4 77.8% #5 2,128 1 34
25 2014 50–25 66.7% #17 1,829 0 1 — — — — — — —
26 2015 41–25 62.1% #13 1,792 0 1 2009 13–3 81.2% #18 2,140 2 35
27 2016 37–21 63.8% #12 1,804 0 2 2010 39–7 84.8% #3 2,189 3 40
28 2017 26–23 53.1% #40 1,747 0 2 2011 21–7 75.0% #13 2,054 4 41
29 2018 27–20 57.4% #23 1,812 0 2 2012 20–7 74.1% #20 2,022 4 41
30 2019 16–18 47.1% #54 1,740 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2020 2–3 40.0% #84 1,716 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2021 1–4 20.0% #342 1,706 0 2 — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — 2020 0–3 0.0% #1030 1,956 4 41
38 — — — — — — — 2021 0–2 0.0% #1154 1,908 4 41

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Carla Suárez Navarro Kim Clijsters
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 6 2 8 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 5 2 7 71.4%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 17 9 26 65.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 32 12 44 72.7% 11 5 16 68.8% 7 2 9 77.8% 4 0 4 100.0%
19 2008 2 6 8 25.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2002 37 11 48 77.1% 9 3 12 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
20 2009 11 12 23 47.8% 16 11 27 59.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2003 57 7 64 89.1% 15 2 17 88.2% 9 1 10 90.0% 5 2 7 71.4%
21 2010 11 8 19 57.9% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — — — — — 2004 13 3 16 81.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 4 0 4 100.0%
22 2011 8 8 16 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 50 5 55 90.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — —
23 2012 10 15 25 40.0% 13 7 20 65.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2006 24 8 32 75.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
24 2013 17 16 33 51.5% 16 7 23 69.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2007 14 3 17 82.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2014 30 17 47 63.8% 17 5 22 77.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2015 27 18 45 60.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2009 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2016 23 14 37 62.2% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2010 32 4 36 88.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
28 2017 11 13 24 45.8% 13 7 20 65.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2011 16 4 20 80.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
29 2018 21 13 34 61.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2012 11 4 15 73.3% — — — — 9 3 12 75.0% — — — —
30 2019 8 11 19 42.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2020 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2021 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 182 156 338 53.8% 131 69 200 65.5% 27 25 52 51.9% 3 3 6 50.0% — 322 80 402 80.1% 59 23 82 72.0% 54 17 71 76.1% 31 8 39 79.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 519/597 of Carla Suárez Navarro's and 201/388 of Kim Clijsters's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Carla Suárez Navarro Kim Clijsters
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2008 10/25 1.1 2.4 67.8% 60.0% 45.9% 46.1% 56.5% 55.3% 44.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2009 44/54 0.6 2.3 68.3% 58.3% 43.5% 48.8% 57.2% 53.5% 45.2% 2003 20/98 2.1 2.5 66.4% 70.7% 49.9% 61.6% 57.5% 64.3% 52.7%
21 2010 32/35 0.5 2.6 69.2% 60.2% 45.3% 57.5% 52.8% 55.6% 48.5% 2004 7/22 1.0 4.7 61.9% 68.5% 52.6% 58.8% 62.8% 62.3% 53.8%
22 2011 23/27 0.6 2.7 66.8% 58.5% 43.8% 46.3% 51.3% 53.5% 46.2% 2005 21/75 2.8 4.3 62.2% 71.7% 47.9% 48.4% 54.4% 62.6% 51.1%
23 2012 44/49 0.7 2.8 61.3% 57.8% 45.9% 47.7% 47.8% 53.5% 46.8% 2006 32/53 2.0 3.3 64.2% 67.8% 47.9% 60.1% 49.3% 60.7% 49.1%
24 2013 61/67 0.7 1.8 68.3% 59.6% 44.8% 49.5% 45.2% 54.8% 46.3% 2007 13/18 1.8 4.6 60.4% 68.1% 53.6% 46.8% 48.2% 62.7% 49.3%
25 2014 66/75 0.8 1.8 71.5% 61.3% 48.8% 59.3% 55.0% 57.6% 47.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2015 53/66 1.1 2.2 68.4% 59.9% 49.2% 52.3% 44.1% 56.5% 43.7% 2009 16/16 2.8 4.1 63.0% 69.2% 54.9% 62.5% 54.3% 63.7% 48.5%
27 2016 53/59 1.5 2.2 67.9% 65.0% 48.9% 55.9% 46.3% 59.6% 46.1% 2010 42/46 2.9 4.5 62.0% 69.3% 51.6% 61.4% 53.0% 62.6% 50.3%
28 2017 49/49 1.0 1.3 69.0% 61.2% 46.6% 51.4% 50.3% 56.7% 47.3% 2011 27/28 2.0 5.0 64.0% 67.6% 46.2% 56.0% 52.0% 60.1% 50.0%
29 2018 42/47 1.4 1.6 63.9% 63.3% 48.7% 48.5% 44.2% 57.8% 42.7% 2012 18/27 2.5 3.4 66.3% 71.8% 49.0% 57.8% 43.7% 64.1% 47.1%
30 2019 34/34 1.3 1.7 64.4% 61.0% 44.3% 53.0% 50.2% 54.9% 44.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2020 5/5 0.4 0.8 67.5% 62.6% 39.7% 54.8% 49.0% 54.7% 42.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2021 3/5 0.7 2.7 62.4% 55.1% 59.1% 31.7% 39.8% 56.1% 29.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 3/3 5.3 6.7 66.9% 62.7% 44.2% 61.9% 30.0% 56.2% 32.9%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 2/2 2.0 9.0 63.1% 58.9% 37.9% 49.2% 41.7% 51.0% 42.3%
Career — 519/597 0.9 2.0 67.5% 60.7% 46.7% 52.0% 49.4% 56.0% 45.8% — 201/594 2.4 4.1 63.5% 69.1% 49.7% 57.7% 51.7% 62.1% 49.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Carla Suárez Navarro Kim Clijsters
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1725 145.5 — — — — -30 -155 -56 67.3% +1.53 2–3 (40%) 0–2 — -0.43
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1913 156.2 — — — — +15 -370 -218 60.2% +0.62 11–8 (58%) 8–2 (80%) 107.4 -1.40
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 2036 161.2 — — — — +15 -316 -171 69.3% +1.43 15–7 (68%) 7–2 (78%) 111.5 -0.33
19 2008 1556 116.3 +0.04 -0.08 0.990 49.7% -80 +117 — 54.7% +0.13 2–3 (40%) 4–3 (57%) 99.2 +0.94 2002 2146 168.0 — — — — +28 -315 -318 69.1% +1.50 12–9 (57%) 5–6 (45%) 100.6 -1.80
20 2009 1648 129.9 -1.19 +1.22 0.973 49.5% -65 +60 +12 53.2% +0.02 10–8 (56%) 4–2 (67%) 104.7 +0.91 2003 2262 176.5 +7.01 +7.29 1.478 58.4% +19 -206 -246 83.9% +2.65 12–7 (63%) 5–1 (83%) 104.0 -2.52
21 2010 1696 132.9 -0.35 +4.10 1.091 51.9% -34 +34 — 56.1% +0.49 10–4 (71%) 4–3 (57%) 108.3 -0.61 2004 2247 155.4 +3.47 +3.81 1.426 57.9% +5 — — 90.2% +2.95 2–1 (67%) 4–0 (100%) 102.2 -0.05
22 2011 1683 118.9 -1.15 +1.17 0.992 49.9% -34 +61 — 57.1% +0.23 4–2 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 101.9 +1.59 2005 2235 173.2 +5.59 +5.46 1.367 56.6% +51 -182 -131 85.4% +2.89 7–5 (58%) 4–5 (44%) 97.3 -0.64
23 2012 1685 129.6 -1.52 +2.21 1.006 50.0% -29 +66 -60 48.0% -0.18 5–7 (42%) 3–4 (43%) 97.9 -1.48 2006 2166 165.9 +5.11 +5.07 1.249 54.5% +47 -71 -23 75.2% +1.82 9–4 (69%) 6–2 (75%) 101.0 -2.33
24 2013 1812 143.2 -0.34 +2.87 1.025 50.5% -61 +74 -102 58.9% +0.40 10–7 (59%) 7–3 (70%) 105.3 -0.62 2007 2128 161.0 +4.97 +3.93 1.322 55.5% +66 — — 70.7% +1.95 4–1 (80%) 1–2 (33%) 99.6 +0.04
25 2014 1829 148.3 +1.78 +3.55 1.120 52.6% -6 +106 -121 64.0% +0.85 13–9 (59%) 11–5 (69%) 105.5 +1.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2015 1793 149.4 -0.63 +3.13 1.005 49.9% +26 +174 -122 55.3% +0.19 19–7 (73%) 11–4 (73%) 110.8 -1.27 2009 2141 159.8 +6.04 +5.04 1.334 55.9% +56 — — 73.7% +1.87 4–2 (67%) 0–1 — -1.42
27 2016 1804 145.7 +3.33 +2.65 1.140 52.6% +4 +149 -65 59.6% +0.74 15–9 (63%) 5–6 (45%) 101.4 +1.43 2010 2190 168.6 +6.21 +7.25 1.348 56.4% +54 — -96 76.2% +2.15 11–4 (73%) 6–4 (60%) 103.3 -2.07
28 2017 1748 140.2 +0.64 +3.29 1.091 51.9% -5 +164 -30 52.8% +0.53 5–7 (42%) 2–8 (20%) 90.1 -1.34 2011 2055 151.4 +3.98 +4.33 1.252 54.8% +97 — — 72.9% +1.73 6–1 (86%) 6–2 (75%) 101.4 +0.06
29 2018 1813 142.4 +1.11 +0.48 1.013 50.2% +26 +26 -114 50.0% -0.15 10–4 (71%) 6–5 (55%) 107.3 +0.39 2012 2023 145.0 +6.00 +3.05 1.314 55.0% +75 — +54 73.6% +1.85 4–1 (80%) 3–4 (43%) 99.1 -0.72
30 2019 1741 136.0 -1.30 +1.97 0.995 49.8% +15 +75 -3 50.0% -0.04 4–6 (40%) 3–3 (50%) 96.4 +1.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2020 1716 126.2 +1.52 +0.87 0.929 48.4% +14 — — 50.0% -0.50 0–2 2–0 — -0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2021 1706 123.3 +1.01 +0.12 0.680 43.7% +26 — — 38.5% -1.15 0–3 (0%) 2–1 (67%) 97.3 -0.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1956 116.1 +0.27 +0.94 0.751 45.5% +63 — — 14.3% -2.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.43
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1908 106.1 +0.32 -1.68 0.864 46.7% — — — 33.3% -1.50 0–2 — — -0.16
Career — 2031 144.8 +0.25 +2.46 1.041 50.8% -12 +94 -70 55.5% +0.30 107–78 (58%) 66–48 (58%) 107.8 +0.19 — 2299 172.4 +5.39 +5.26 1.313 55.7% +36 -226 -114 74.6% +1.92 99–56 (64%) 55–34 (62%) 106.7 -2.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.