H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Carla Suárez Navarro vs Serena Williams H2H: 0-7

Serena Williams holds a 7–0 lead over Carla Suárez Navarro in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Serena Williams leads 3–0 on clay and 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Serena Williams won the 2019 Wimbledon fourth round 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Carla Suárez Navarro
ESP Age 37 Right-Handed 162 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0 – 7
7 main draw meetings
Serena Williams
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 9, 2019* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Serena Williams #10 6-2 6-2 Carla Suárez Navarro #31 Match data
May 9, 2015* Madrid WTA 1000 QF Clay Serena Williams #1 6-1 6-3 Carla Suárez Navarro #12 Match data
Mar 29, 2015* Miami WTA 1000 F Hard Serena Williams #1 6-2 6-0 Carla Suárez Navarro #12 Match data
May 9, 2014* Madrid WTA 1000 R16 Clay Serena Williams #1 6-2 6-3 Carla Suárez Navarro #14 Match data
Sep 5, 2013* US Open Grand Slam QF Hard Serena Williams #1 6-0 6-0 Carla Suárez Navarro #20 Match data
May 18, 2013* Rome WTA 1000 QF Clay Serena Williams #1 6-2 6-0 Carla Suárez Navarro #22 Match data
Jan 23, 2010* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Serena Williams #1 6-0 6-3 Carla Suárez Navarro #33 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Carla Suárez Navarro #342 #6 4,015 2,022 339 247 57.8% 0 1 0 0 1 2
Serena Williams #320 #1 13,615 2,405 825 170 82.9% 23 23 5 17 3 71

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Carla Suárez Navarro Serena Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1997 3–2 60.0% #101 1,582 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1998 26–11 70.3% #20 1,895 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1999 37–7 84.1% #4 2,170 1 4
18 — — — — — — — 2000 37–8 82.2% #6 2,174 1 7
19 2008 13–11 54.2% #49 1,567 0 0 2001 40–7 85.1% #6 2,259 1 10
20 2009 29–25 53.7% #33 1,648 0 0 2002 57–5 91.9% #1 2,348 4 18
21 2010 21–14 60.0% #57 1,696 0 0 2003 36–3 92.3% #3 2,369 6 22
22 2011 15–12 55.6% #56 1,682 0 0 2004 39–11 78.0% #7 2,192 6 24
23 2012 23–24 48.9% #34 1,676 0 0 2005 21–9 70.0% #11 2,028 7 25
24 2013 41–26 61.2% #17 1,812 0 0 2006 12–4 75.0% #95 2,016 7 25
25 2014 50–25 66.7% #17 1,835 0 1 2007 34–10 77.3% #7 2,058 8 27
26 2015 41–25 62.1% #13 1,787 0 1 2008 41–8 83.7% #2 2,109 9 31
27 2016 35–19 64.8% #12 1,812 0 2 2009 50–13 79.4% #1 2,106 11 34
28 2017 26–23 53.1% #40 1,749 0 2 2010 25–4 86.2% #4 2,149 13 36
29 2018 27–19 58.7% #23 1,826 0 2 2011 22–4 84.6% #12 2,155 13 38
30 2019 16–18 47.1% #54 1,742 0 2 2012 48–6 88.9% #3 2,239 15 44
31 2020 2–3 40.0% #84 1,717 0 2 2013 77–5 93.9% #1 2,345 17 55
32 2021 0–3 0.0% #342 1,688 0 2 2014 52–10 83.9% #1 2,209 18 62
33 — — — — — — — 2015 50–6 89.3% #1 2,197 21 67
34 — — — — — — — 2016 36–5 87.8% #2 2,177 22 69
35 — — — — — — — 2017 8–1 88.9% #22 2,172 23 70
36 — — — — — — — 2018 18–7 72.0% #16 2,078 23 70
37 — — — — — — — 2019 25–8 75.8% #10 2,052 23 70
38 — — — — — — — 2020 16–5 76.2% #11 1,991 23 71
39 — — — — — — — 2021 12–6 66.7% #41 1,950 23 71
40 — — — — — — — 2022 3–4 42.9% #320 1,891 23 71
44 — — — — — — — 2026 0–1 0.0% #320 — 23 71