H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Carla Suárez Navarro vs Zarina Diyas H2H: 1-1
Carla Suárez Navarro and Zarina Diyas are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Carla Suárez Navarro leads 1–0 on clay, while Zarina Diyas leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Carla Suárez Navarro won the 2015 Madrid second round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 37
Right-Handed
162 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
KAZ
Age 32
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2015* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Carla Suárez Navarro | 6-4 6-4 | Zarina Diyas | Match data |
| Jun 27, 2014* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Zarina Diyas | 7-6(12) 5-7 6-2 | Carla Suárez Navarro | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carla Suárez Navarro | #342 | #6 | 4,015 | 2,022 | 339 | 247 | 57.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Zarina Diyas | #437 | #31 | 1,495 | 1,751 | 99 | 127 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Carla Suárez Navarro | Zarina Diyas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #242 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #227 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #264 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2008 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #49 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #33 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #33 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #52 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2011 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #56 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #150 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2012 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #34 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #66 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2013 | 41–26 | 61.2% | #17 | 1,812 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #89 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2014 | 50–25 | 66.7% | #17 | 1,835 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #77 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2015 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #13 | 1,787 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #80 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2016 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #12 | 1,812 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #102 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2017 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #40 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1031 | 1,680 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2018 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #23 | 1,826 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2019 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #54 | 1,742 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #382 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2020 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,717 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2021 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #342 | 1,688 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |