H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Caroline Garcia vs Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic H2H: 0-1
Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic holds a 1–0 lead over Caroline Garcia in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic won the 2015 Rome second round 7-6(4) 4-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 32
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 34
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2015* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic | 7-6(4) 4-6 6-2 | Caroline Garcia | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caroline Garcia | #452 | #4 | 5,170 | 2,008 | 335 | 263 | 56.0% | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 11 |
| Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic | #546 | #32 | 1,485 | 1,737 | 97 | 125 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Caroline Garcia | Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2012 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #154 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #80 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2013 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #74 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 14–26 | 35.0% | #73 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #37 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #56 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2015 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2016 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #24 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #57 | 1,615 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2017 | 48–22 | 68.6% | #8 | 1,969 | 0 | 5 | 2015 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #79 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2018 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #19 | 1,917 | 0 | 6 | 2016 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #725 | 1,558 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2019 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #46 | 1,694 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2020 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #43 | 1,735 | 0 | 7 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #546 | 1,518 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2021 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #74 | 1,700 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2022 | 44–20 | 68.8% | #4 | 1,988 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2023 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #20 | 1,831 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2024 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #48 | 1,797 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2025 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #304 | 1,745 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |